mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Chain-of-Trust: A Progressive Trust Evaluation Framework Enabled by Generative AI

arXiv 2506.17130 ↗First posted 20 Jun 2025cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In collaborative systems with complex tasks relying on distributed resources, trust evaluation of potential collaborators has emerged as an effective mechanism for task completion. However, due to the network dynamics and varying information gathering latencies, it is extremely challenging to observe and collect all trust attributes of a collaborating device concurrently for a comprehensive trust assessment. In this paper, a novel progressive trust evaluation framework, namely chain-of-trust, is proposed to make better use of misaligned device attribute data. This framework, designed for effective task completion, divides the trust evaluation process into multiple chained stages based on task decomposition. At each stage, based on the task completion process, the framework only gathers the latest device attribute data relevant to that stage, leading to reduced trust evaluation complexity and overhead. By leveraging advanced in-context learning, few-shot learning, and reasoning capabilities, generative AI is then employed to analyze and interpret the collected data to produce correct evaluation results quickly. Only devices deemed trustworthy at this stage proceed to the next round of trust evaluation. The framework ultimately determines devices that remain trustworthy across all stages. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves high accuracy in trust evaluation.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2025.

Builds on

4 of 24 references.

References · 4

  1. 2024When Large Language Model Agents Meet 6G Networks: Perception, Grounding, and Alignmentcited by 43
  2. 2023A Wireless AI-Generated Content (AIGC) Provisioning Framework Empowered by Semantic Communicationcited by 8
  3. 2024Hypergraph-Aided Task-Resource Matching for Maximizing Value of Task Completion in Collaborative IoT Systemscited by 5
  4. 2020Smart City IoT Services Creation through Large Scale Collaborationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Multi-View Trust Evaluation for Collaborator Selection via Evidential Deep Learning
  2. 2026Skillsets on the Chain: A Blockchain-based Zero-Trust Framework for Agentic AI Networking
  3. 2026A Unified Evaluation Framework for Trustworthy Large Language Models, Agentic AI, and Multimodal Systems
  4. 2026Agentic Trust Coordination for Federated Learning through Adaptive Thresholding and Autonomous Decision Making in Sustainable and Resilient Industrial Networks
  5. 2026Trustworthy Agent Network: Trust in Agent Networks Must Be Baked In, Not Bolted On
  6. 2026Beyond Benchmark Islands: Toward Representative Trustworthiness Evaluation for Agentic AI
  7. 2026Toward Safe and Responsible AI Agents: A Three-Pillar Model for Transparency, Accountability, and Trustworthiness
  8. 2026TRUST: A Framework for Decentralized AI Service v.0.1