mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Importance of Out-of-Band Metadata for Safe Autonomous Agents: The Redpanda Agentic Data Plane

arXiv 2605.29082 ↗First posted 27 May 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

AI agents are increasingly expected to operate as digital employees: accessing enterprise data, making decisions, and taking actions autonomously. But agents are simultaneously less predictable than humans -- prone to hallucination, misinterpretation, and adversarial manipulation -- and more technically capable: with deep system knowledge and high-throughput interfaces cascading damage at machine speed. This combination makes it unsafe to rely on agents to faithfully interpret or propagate security-critical metadata such as access policies, data classifications, and behavioral constraints. We present the Redpanda Agentic Data Plane (ADP), an architecture built around out-of-band metadata channels: infrastructure pathways that carry security context, policy signals, and audit trails deterministically, entirely outside the agent's read and write path and across heterogeneous infrastructure. These channels enforce governance at every stage of the agent lifecycle -- scoping data access on the way in, constraining actions during execution, and capturing tamper-proof transcripts on the way out. We demonstrate ADP with a multi-agent portfolio rebalancing system in which autonomous agents monitor markets, make trade decisions, and execute orders across isolated client accounts -- with per-client data scoping, trade approval thresholds, and tamper-proof audit trails all enforced by out-of-band channels the agents can neither see nor bypass.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.

Builds on

8 of 27 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Authenticated Workflows: A Systems Approach to Protecting Agentic AI11 Feb
  2. 2026AgentTrace: A Structured Logging Framework for Agent System Observability7 Feb
  3. 2026SMCP: Secure Model Context Protocol1 Feb
  4. 2026Taming Various Privilege Escalation in LLM-Based Agent Systems: A Mandatory Access Control Framework17 Jan
  5. 2025SoK: Trust-Authorization Mismatch in LLM Agent Interactions7 Dec
  6. 2025Prompt Flow Integrity to Prevent Privilege Escalation in LLM Agents17 Mar
  7. 2023Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox25 Sep

Other references · 1

  1. 2026Faramesh: A Protocol-Agnostic Execution Control Plane for Autonomous Agent Systemscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AgentRiskBOM: A Risk-Scoping Security Bill of Materials for Agentic AI Systems
  2. 2026Securing the AI Agent: A Unified Framework for Multi-Layer Agent Red Teaming
  3. 2025Governance-as-a-Service: A Multi-Agent Framework for AI System Compliance and Policy Enforcement
  4. 2026Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: The AgentBound Framework
  5. 2025Safe, Untrusted, "Proof-Carrying" AI Agents: toward the agentic lakehouse
  6. 2026Trustworthy Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Cybersecurity and Systems Survey on Threat Landscapes, Defense Architectures, and Open Challenges
  7. 2026AgentXploit: Autonomous Repository-to-Runtime Red-Teaming for AI Agents
  8. 2026Verifiable Agentic Infrastructure: Proof-Derived Authorization for Sovereign AI Systems