On the (In)Security of LLM App Stores
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
LLM app stores have seen rapid growth, leading to the proliferation of numerous custom LLM apps. However, this expansion raises security concerns. In this study, we propose a three-layer concern framework to identify the potential security risks of LLM apps, i.e., LLM apps with abusive potential, LLM apps with malicious intent, and LLM apps with exploitable vulnerabilities. Over five months, we collected 786,036 LLM apps from six major app stores: GPT Store, FlowGPT, Poe, Coze, Cici, and Character.AI. Our research integrates static and dynamic analysis, the development of a large-scale toxic word dictionary (i.e., ToxicDict) comprising over 31,783 entries, and automated monitoring tools to identify and mitigate threats. We uncovered that 15,146 apps had misleading descriptions, 1,366 collected sensitive personal information against their privacy policies, and 15,996 generated harmful content such as hate speech, self-harm, extremism, etc. Additionally, we evaluated the potential for LLM apps to facilitate malicious activities, finding that 616 apps could be used for malware generation, phishing, etc. Our findings highlight the urgent need for robust regulatory frameworks and enhanced enforcement mechanisms.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2024.
Builds on
21 of 60 references.
References · 21
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
- 2024JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Modelscited by 494
- 2023ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversationcited by 224
- 2023On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Modelscited by 124
- 2024PLeak: Prompt Leaking Attacks against Large Language Model Applicationscited by 113
- 2023LLM Platform Security: Applying a Systematic Evaluation Framework to OpenAI's ChatGPT Pluginscited by 49
- 2023On the Safety of Open-Sourced Large Language Models: Does Alignment Really Prevent Them From Being Misused?cited by 25
- 2024Malla: Demystifying Real-world Large Language Model Integrated Malicious Servicescited by 24
- 2024Large Language Model Supply Chain: A Research Agendacited by 23
9 more
- 2024A First Look at GPT Apps: Landscape and Vulnerabilitycited by 15
- 2024LLM App Store Analysis: A Vision and Roadmapcited by 12
- 2023Opening A Pandora's Box: Things You Should Know in the Era of Custom GPTscited by 8
- 2024AbuseGPT: Abuse of Generative AI ChatBots to Create Smishing Campaignscited by 7
- 2024Unveiling the Misuse Potential of Base Large Language Models via In-Context Learningcited by 5
- 2024GPT Store Mining and Analysiscited by 5
- 2024GPT in Sheep's Clothing: The Risk of Customized GPTscited by 4
- 2024GPTs Window Shopping: An analysis of the Landscape of Custom ChatGPT Modelscited by 4
- 2024GPTZoo: A Large-scale Dataset of GPTs for the Research Communitycited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 8; 2026: 3.
12 papers.
- 2025Position: Privacy Is Not Just Memorization!cited by 15
- 2025System Prompt Poisoning: Persistent Attacks on Large Language Models Beyond User Injectioncited by 14
- 2025Malicious LLM-Based Conversational AI Makes Users Reveal Personal Informationcited by 10
- 2025LLM Applications: Current Paradigms and the Next Frontiercited by 8
- 2025RedTeamLLM: an Agentic AI framework for offensive securitycited by 6
- 2026When Agents Do Not Stop: Uncovering Infinite Agentic Loops in LLM Agentscited by 6
- 2025FDLLM: A Dedicated Detector for Black-Box LLMs Fingerprintingcited by 4
- 2024LLM App Squatting and Cloningcited by 1
- 2025A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis of Custom GPTs' Vulnerabilities in the OpenAI Ecosystemcited by 1
- 2025LaQual: An Automated Framework for LLM App Quality Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Do No Harm? Hallucination and Actor-Level Abuse in Web-Deployed Medical Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026AgentFlow: Building Agent Dependency Graphs for Static Analysis of Agent Programscited by 0
- 2026When Agents Do Not Stop: Uncovering Infinite Agentic Loops in LLM Agents2 Jul 2026
- 2026AgentFlow: Building Agent Dependency Graphs for Static Analysis of Agent Programs2 Jul 2026
- 2026Do No Harm? Hallucination and Actor-Level Abuse in Web-Deployed Medical Large Language Models20 May 2026
- 2025Position: Privacy Is Not Just Memorization!2 Oct 2025
- 2025LaQual: An Automated Framework for LLM App Quality Evaluation26 Aug 2025
- 2025Malicious LLM-Based Conversational AI Makes Users Reveal Personal Information13 Jun 2025
- 2025A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis of Custom GPTs' Vulnerabilities in the OpenAI Ecosystem13 May 2025
- 2025RedTeamLLM: an Agentic AI framework for offensive security11 May 2025
- 2025System Prompt Poisoning: Persistent Attacks on Large Language Models Beyond User Injection10 May 2025
- 2025LLM Applications: Current Paradigms and the Next Frontier6 Mar 2025
- 2025FDLLM: A Dedicated Detector for Black-Box LLMs Fingerprinting27 Jan 2025
- 2024LLM App Squatting and Cloning12 Nov 2024