mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the (In)Security of LLM App Stores

arXiv 2407.08422 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2024cs.CR cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM app stores have seen rapid growth, leading to the proliferation of numerous custom LLM apps. However, this expansion raises security concerns. In this study, we propose a three-layer concern framework to identify the potential security risks of LLM apps, i.e., LLM apps with abusive potential, LLM apps with malicious intent, and LLM apps with exploitable vulnerabilities. Over five months, we collected 786,036 LLM apps from six major app stores: GPT Store, FlowGPT, Poe, Coze, Cici, and Character.AI. Our research integrates static and dynamic analysis, the development of a large-scale toxic word dictionary (i.e., ToxicDict) comprising over 31,783 entries, and automated monitoring tools to identify and mitigate threats. We uncovered that 15,146 apps had misleading descriptions, 1,366 collected sensitive personal information against their privacy policies, and 15,996 generated harmful content such as hate speech, self-harm, extremism, etc. Additionally, we evaluated the potential for LLM apps to facilitate malicious activities, finding that 616 apps could be used for malware generation, phishing, etc. Our findings highlight the urgent need for robust regulatory frameworks and enhanced enforcement mechanisms.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2024.

Builds on

21 of 60 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  2. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  3. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
  4. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
  5. 2024JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Modelscited by 494
  6. 2023ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversationcited by 224
  7. 2023On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Modelscited by 124
  8. 2024PLeak: Prompt Leaking Attacks against Large Language Model Applicationscited by 113
  9. 2023LLM Platform Security: Applying a Systematic Evaluation Framework to OpenAI's ChatGPT Pluginscited by 49
  10. 2023On the Safety of Open-Sourced Large Language Models: Does Alignment Really Prevent Them From Being Misused?cited by 25
  11. 2024Malla: Demystifying Real-world Large Language Model Integrated Malicious Servicescited by 24
  12. 2024Large Language Model Supply Chain: A Research Agendacited by 23
9 more
  1. 2024A First Look at GPT Apps: Landscape and Vulnerabilitycited by 15
  2. 2024LLM App Store Analysis: A Vision and Roadmapcited by 12
  3. 2023Opening A Pandora's Box: Things You Should Know in the Era of Custom GPTscited by 8
  4. 2024AbuseGPT: Abuse of Generative AI ChatBots to Create Smishing Campaignscited by 7
  5. 2024Unveiling the Misuse Potential of Base Large Language Models via In-Context Learningcited by 5
  6. 2024GPT Store Mining and Analysiscited by 5
  7. 2024GPT in Sheep's Clothing: The Risk of Customized GPTscited by 4
  8. 2024GPTs Window Shopping: An analysis of the Landscape of Custom ChatGPT Modelscited by 4
  9. 2024GPTZoo: A Large-scale Dataset of GPTs for the Research Communitycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 8; 2026: 3.

12 papers.