mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hallucination-Resistant Relation Extraction via Dependency-Aware Sentence Simplification and Two-tiered Hierarchical Refinement

arXiv 2508.14391 ↗First posted 20 Aug 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Relation extraction (RE) enables the construction of structured knowledge for many downstream applications. While large language models (LLMs) have shown great promise in this task, they often struggle to reliably determine whether a relation exists, particularly in sentences with complex syntax or subtle semantics. For instance, we find that Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct incorrectly predicts a relation in 96.9% of NO-RELATION instances on SciERC, revealing a severe hallucination problem. To address these challenges, we propose DEPTH, a framework that integrates Dependency-aware sEntence simPlification and Two-tiered Hierarchical refinement into the relation extraction pipeline. Given a sentence and its candidate entity pairs, DEPTH operates in two stages: (1) the Grounding module extracts relations for each pair by leveraging their shortest dependency path, distilling the sentence into a minimal yet coherent relational context that reduces syntactic noise while preserving key semantics; (2) the Refinement module aggregates all local predictions and revises them based on a holistic understanding of the sentence, correcting omissions and inconsistencies. We further introduce a causality-driven reward model that mitigates reward hacking by disentangling spurious correlations, enabling robust fine-tuning via reinforcement learning with human feedback. Experiments on eight well-established benchmarks demonstrate that DEPTH reduces the average hallucination rate to 7.9% while achieving a 9.3% improvement in average F1 score over existing LLM-based extraction baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 46 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2025.

Builds on

46 of 75 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 45

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  3. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  4. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
  5. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,095
  6. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
  7. 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 836
  8. 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHFcited by 712
  9. 2017Ray: A Distributed Framework for Emerging AI Applicationscited by 527
  10. 2016Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 334
  11. 2018Multi-Task Identification of Entities, Relations, and Coreference for Scientific Knowledge Graph Constructioncited by 322
  12. 2019DocRED: A Large-Scale Document-Level Relation Extraction Datasetcited by 239
33 more
  1. 2022Unified Structure Generation for Universal Information Extractioncited by 221
  2. 2023Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hackingcited by 200
  3. 2023Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Surveycited by 185
  4. 2023InstructUIE: Multi-task Instruction Tuning for Unified Information Extractioncited by 170
  5. 2016End-to-End Relation Extraction using LSTMs on Sequences and Tree Structurescited by 161
  6. 2024ODIN: Disentangled Reward Mitigates Hacking in RLHFcited by 136
  7. 2023Evaluating ChatGPT's Information Extraction Capabilities: An Assessment of Performance, Explainability, Calibration, and Faithfulnesscited by 130
  8. 2020TACRED Revisited: A Thorough Evaluation of the TACRED Relation Extraction Taskcited by 96
  9. 2024RRM: Robust Reward Model Training Mitigates Reward Hackingcited by 76
  10. 2021Re-TACRED: Addressing Shortcomings of the TACRED Datasetcited by 74
  11. 2019Effective Modeling of Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Joint Entity and Relation Extractioncited by 73
  12. 2020Spatial Dependency Parsing for Semi-Structured Document Information Extractioncited by 65
  13. 2023GPT-RE: In-context Learning for Relation Extraction using Large Language Modelscited by 62
  14. 2019Document-Level N-ary Relation Extraction with Multiscale Representation Learningcited by 52
  15. 2021Packed Levitated Marker for Entity and Relation Extractioncited by 49
  16. 2023Explore Spurious Correlations at the Concept Level in Language Models for Text Classificationcited by 48
  17. 2023Aligning Instruction Tasks Unlocks Large Language Models as Zero-Shot Relation Extractorscited by 45
  18. 2017Relation Extraction : A Surveycited by 44
  19. 2025Beyond Reward Hacking: Causal Rewards for Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 42
  20. 2016Question Answering on Freebase via Relation Extraction and Textual Evidencecited by 39
  21. 2023How to Unleash the Power of Large Language Models for Few-shot Relation Extraction?cited by 30
  22. 2020DWIE: an entity-centric dataset for multi-task document-level information extractioncited by 29
  23. 2023Revisiting Large Language Models as Zero-shot Relation Extractorscited by 29
  24. 2021A Trigger-Sense Memory Flow Framework for Joint Entity and Relation Extractioncited by 26
  25. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Relation Extraction: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 22
  26. 2024AutoRE: Document-Level Relation Extraction with Large Language Modelscited by 16
  27. 2015Semantic Relation Classification via Convolutional Neural Networks with Simple Negative Samplingcited by 12
  28. 2024Unleashing the Power of Large Language Models in Zero-shot Relation Extraction via Self-Promptingcited by 10
  29. 2024Grasping the Essentials: Tailoring Large Language Models for Zero-Shot Relation Extractioncited by 9
  30. 2024LLM with Relation Classifier for Document-Level Relation Extractioncited by 8
  31. 2024The Effects of Hallucinations in Synthetic Training Data for Relation Extractioncited by 7
  32. 2020In Layman's Terms: Semi-Open Relation Extraction from Scientific Textscited by 6
  33. 2024Learning Causally Invariant Reward Functions from Diverse Demonstrationscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Revisiting Relation Extraction in the era of Large Language Models
  2. 2023Think Rationally about What You See: Continuous Rationale Extraction for Relation Extraction
  3. 2026ReaORE: Reasoning-Guided Progressive Open Relation Extraction Empowered by Large Reasoning Models
  4. 2026Bridging the Long-Tail Gap: Robust Retrieval-Augmented Relation Completion via Multi-Stage Paraphrase Infusion
  5. 2024Reefknot: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Relation Hallucination Evaluation, Analysis and Mitigation in Multimodal Large Language Models
  6. 2026CONSISTRE: A Unified Consistency-Aware Framework for Document-Level Relation Extraction with Large Language Models
  7. 2022RelationPrompt: Leveraging Prompts to Generate Synthetic Data for Zero-Shot Relation Triplet Extraction
  8. 2024AgentRE: An Agent-Based Framework for Navigating Complex Information Landscapes in Relation Extraction