mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Grasping the Essentials: Tailoring Large Language Models for Zero-Shot Relation Extraction

arXiv 2402.11142 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2024cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Relation extraction (RE) aims to identify semantic relationships between entities within text. Despite considerable advancements, existing models predominantly require extensive annotated training data, which is both costly and labor-intensive to collect. Moreover, these models often struggle to adapt to new or unseen relations. Few-shot learning, aiming to lessen annotation demands, typically provides incomplete and biased supervision for target relations, leading to degraded and unstable performance. To accurately and explicitly describe relation semantics while minimizing annotation demands, we explore the definition only zero-shot RE setting where only relation definitions expressed in natural language are used to train a RE model. We introduce REPaL, comprising three stages: (1) We leverage large language models (LLMs) to generate initial seed instances from relation definitions and an unlabeled corpus. (2) We fine-tune a bidirectional Small Language Model (SLM) with initial seeds to learn relations for the target domain. (3) We expand pattern coverage and mitigate bias from initial seeds by integrating feedback from the SLM's predictions on the unlabeled corpus and the synthesis history. To accomplish this, we leverage the multi-turn conversation ability of LLMs to generate new instances in follow-up dialogues, informed by both the feedback and synthesis history. Studies reveal that definition-oriented seed synthesis enhances pattern coverage whereas indiscriminately increasing seed quantity leads to performance saturation. Experiments on two datasets show REPaL significantly improved cost-effective zero-shot performance by large margins.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2024.

Builds on

37 of 52 references.

References · 37

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  6. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  7. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
  8. 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,103
  9. 2022Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questionscited by 911
  10. 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 754
  11. 2017Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehensioncited by 425
  12. 2020LUKE: Deep Contextualized Entity Representations with Entity-aware Self-attentioncited by 326
25 more
  1. 2018FewRel: A Large-Scale Supervised Few-Shot Relation Classification Dataset with State-of-the-Art Evaluationcited by 254
  2. 2023ChatIE: Zero-Shot Information Extraction via Chatting with ChatGPTcited by 250
  3. 2021PTR: Prompt Tuning with Rules for Text Classificationcited by 238
  4. 2022Generating Training Data with Language Models: Towards Zero-Shot Language Understandingcited by 199
  5. 2021KnowPrompt: Knowledge-aware Prompt-tuning with Synergistic Optimization for Relation Extractioncited by 180
  6. 2023Large Language Model Is Not a Good Few-shot Information Extractor, but a Good Reranker for Hard Samples!cited by 119
  7. 2023Revisiting Relation Extraction in the era of Large Language Modelscited by 100
  8. 2021Re-TACRED: Addressing Shortcomings of the TACRED Datasetcited by 73
  9. 2021Label Verbalization and Entailment for Effective Zero- and Few-Shot Relation Extractioncited by 73
  10. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Taskscited by 73
  11. 2023Thread of Thought Unraveling Chaotic Contextscited by 71
  12. 2022RelationPrompt: Leveraging Prompts to Generate Synthetic Data for Zero-Shot Relation Triplet Extractioncited by 60
  13. 2020More Data, More Relations, More Context and More Openness: A Review and Outlook for Relation Extractioncited by 52
  14. 2021ZS-BERT: Towards Zero-Shot Relation Extraction with Attribute Representation Learningcited by 46
  15. 2023Aligning Instruction Tasks Unlocks Large Language Models as Zero-Shot Relation Extractorscited by 44
  16. 2024Synthetic Dialogue Dataset Generation using LLM Agentscited by 39
  17. 2019Neural Snowball for Few-Shot Relation Learningcited by 22
  18. 2023Open-Domain Hierarchical Event Schema Induction by Incremental Prompting and Verificationcited by 19
  19. 2024Consistency Guided Knowledge Retrieval and Denoising in LLMs for Zero-shot Document-level Relation Triplet Extractioncited by 14
  20. 2023RE-Matching: A Fine-Grained Semantic Matching Method for Zero-Shot Relation Extractioncited by 13
  21. 2022Open-Vocabulary Argument Role Prediction for Event Extractioncited by 11
  22. 2022Open Relation and Event Type Discovery with Type Abstractioncited by 9
  23. 2023The Benefits of Label-Description Training for Zero-Shot Text Classificationcited by 4
  24. 2022Towards End-to-End Open Conversational Machine Readingcited by 2
  25. 2015Solving Verbal Comprehension Questions in IQ Test by Knowledge-Powered Word Embeddingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

9 papers.