Semantic-Aware Reconstruction Error for Detecting AI-Generated Images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, AI-generated image detection has gained increasing attention, as the rapid advancement of image generation technologies has raised serious concerns about their potential misuse. While existing detection methods have achieved promising results, their performance often degrades significantly when facing fake images from unseen, out-of-distribution (OOD) generative models, since they primarily rely on model-specific artifacts and thus overfit to the models used for training. To address this limitation, we propose a novel representation, namely Semantic-Aware Reconstruction Error (SARE), that measures the semantic difference between an image and its caption-guided reconstruction. The key hypothesis behind SARE is that real images, whose captions often fail to fully capture their complex visual content, may undergo noticeable semantic shifts during the caption-guided reconstruction process. In contrast, fake images, which closely align with their captions, show minimal semantic changes. By quantifying these semantic shifts, SARE provides a robust and discriminative feature for detecting fake images across diverse generative models. Additionally, we introduce a fusion module that integrates SARE into the backbone detector via a cross-attention mechanism. Image features attend to semantic representations extracted from SARE, enabling the model to adaptively leverage semantic information. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves strong generalization, outperforming existing baselines on benchmarks including GenImage and ForenSynths. We further validate the effectiveness of caption guidance through a detailed analysis of semantic shifts, confirming its ability to enhance detection robustness.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2025.
Builds on
47 of 60 references.
References · 47
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,655
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
- 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,717
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
- 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,290
35 more
- 2021GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 3,595
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
- 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
- 2019Semantic Image Synthesis with Spatially-Adaptive Normalizationcited by 1,295
- 2022Null-text Inversion for Editing Real Images using Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 1,168
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,095
- 2017StarGAN: Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-Domain Image-to-Image Translationcited by 1,036
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 842
- 2021Vector Quantized Diffusion Model for Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 773
- 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
- 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 483
- 2018Learning to See in the Darkcited by 459
- 2023DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 386
- 2023GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Imagecited by 318
- 2019Detecting and Simulating Artifacts in GAN Fake Imagescited by 293
- 2022On the detection of synthetic images generated by diffusion modelscited by 282
- 2021Generalizing Face Forgery Detection with High-frequency Featurescited by 261
- 2017Photographic Image Synthesis with Cascaded Refinement Networkscited by 223
- 2020Global Texture Enhancement for Fake Face Detection in the Wildcited by 220
- 2024A Sanity Check for AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 187
- 2023UCF: Uncovering Common Features for Generalizable Deepfake Detectioncited by 177
- 2022DE-FAKE: Detection and Attribution of Fake Images Generated by Text-to-Image Generation Modelscited by 167
- 2024AEROBLADE: Training-Free Detection of Latent Diffusion Images Using Autoencoder Reconstruction Errorcited by 123
- 2024C2P-CLIP: Injecting Category Common Prompt in CLIP to Enhance Generalization in Deepfake Detectioncited by 111
- 2024FakeInversion: Learning to Detect Images from Unseen Text-to-Image Models by Inverting Stable Diffusioncited by 61
- 2018Diverse Image Synthesis from Semantic Layouts via Conditional IMLEcited by 60
- 2021Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizoncited by 56
- 2023Generalizable Synthetic Image Detection via Language-guided Contrastive Learningcited by 48
- 2024LaRE2: Latent Reconstruction Error Based Method for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 47
- 2024FIRE: Robust Detection of Diffusion-Generated Images via Frequency-Guided Reconstruction Errorcited by 46
- 2024SwiftEdit: Lightning Fast Text-Guided Image Editing via One-Step Diffusioncited by 28
- 2024Eta Inversion: Designing an Optimal Eta Function for Diffusion-based Real Image Editingcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.