mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Algorithmic Fairness Verification with Graphical Models

arXiv 2109.09447 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, machine learning (ML) algorithms have been deployed in safety-critical and high-stake decision-making, where the fairness of algorithms is of paramount importance. Fairness in ML centers on detecting bias towards certain demographic populations induced by an ML classifier and proposes algorithmic solutions to mitigate the bias with respect to different fairness definitions. To this end, several fairness verifiers have been proposed that compute the bias in the prediction of an ML classifier--essentially beyond a finite dataset--given the probability distribution of input features. In the context of verifying linear classifiers, existing fairness verifiers are limited by accuracy due to imprecise modeling of correlations among features and scalability due to restrictive formulations of the classifiers as SSAT/SMT formulas or by sampling. In this paper, we propose an efficient fairness verifier, called FVGM, that encodes the correlations among features as a Bayesian network. In contrast to existing verifiers, FVGM proposes a stochastic subset-sum based approach for verifying linear classifiers. Experimentally, we show that FVGM leads to an accurate and scalable assessment for more diverse families of fairness-enhancing algorithms, fairness attacks, and group/causal fairness metrics than the state-of-the-art fairness verifiers. We also demonstrate that FVGM facilitates the computation of fairness influence functions as a stepping stone to detect the source of bias induced by subsets of features.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2021.

Builds on

13 of 46 references.

References · 13

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  4. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  5. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  6. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  7. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  8. 2017Fair Inference On Outcomescited by 143
  9. 2020Poisoning Attacks on Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 58
  10. 2020Verifying Individual Fairness in Machine Learning Modelscited by 49
  11. 2015On the relation between accuracy and fairness in binary classificationcited by 47
  12. 2018Probabilistic Verification of Fairness Properties via Concentrationcited by 45
1 more
  1. 2020Justicia: A Stochastic SAT Approach to Formally Verify Fairnesscited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.

16 papers.

Sort: