mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Time-reversed Flow Matching with Worst Transport in High-dimensional Latent Space for Image Anomaly Detection

arXiv 2508.05461 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2025cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Likelihood-based deep generative models have been widely investigated for Image Anomaly Detection (IAD), particularly Normalizing Flows, yet their strict architectural invertibility needs often constrain scalability, particularly in large-scale data regimes. Although time-parameterized Flow Matching (FM) serves as a scalable alternative, it remains computationally challenging in IAD due to the prohibitive costs of Jacobian-trace estimation. This paper proposes time-reversed Flow Matching (rFM), which shifts the objective from exact likelihood computation to evaluating target-domain regularity through density proxy estimation. We uncover two fundamental theoretical bottlenecks in this paradigm: first, the reversed vector field exhibits a non-Lipschitz singularity at the initial temporal boundary, precipitating explosive estimation errors. Second, the concentration of measure in high-dimensional Gaussian manifolds induces structured irregularities, giving rise to a Centripetal Potential Field (CPF) that steers trajectories away from Optimal Transport (OT) paths. We identify these observations as the inherent dualities between FM and rFM. To address these issues, we introduce local Worst Transport Flow matching (WT-Flow), which amplifies the observed CPF of rFM to mitigate the initial singularity while circumventing the need for exact distribution transformations via density proxy. Experiments on five datasets demonstrate that WT-Flow achieves state-of-the-art performance among single-scale flow-based methods, and competitive performance against leading multi-scale approaches. Furthermore, the proposed framework enables superior one-step inference, achieving a per-image flow latency of only 6.7 ms. Our code is available on https://github.com/lil-wayne-0319/fmad.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 57 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2025.

Builds on

57 of 78 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023On Diffusion Modeling for Anomaly Detection29 May
  2. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct
  3. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow7 Sep

Other references · 54

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  4. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  5. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  6. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  7. 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Modelscited by 3,045
  8. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  9. 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 776
  10. 2021Maximum Likelihood Training of Score-Based Diffusion Modelscited by 672
  11. 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 596
  12. 2020PaDiM: a Patch Distribution Modeling Framework for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 594
38 more
  1. 2021DRAEM -- A discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detectioncited by 514
  2. 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 453
  3. 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
  4. 2022Anomaly Detection via Reverse Distillation from One-Class Embeddingcited by 421
  5. 2022SPot-the-Difference Self-Supervised Pre-training for Anomaly Detection and Segmentationcited by 400
  6. 2019Augmented Neural ODEscited by 397
  7. 2021CFLOW-AD: Real-Time Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Localization via Conditional Normalizing Flowscited by 321
  8. 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 315
  9. 2020Sub-Image Anomaly Detection with Deep Pyramid Correspondencescited by 300
  10. 2022A Unified Model for Multi-class Anomaly Detectioncited by 268
  11. 2023SimpleNet: A Simple Network for Image Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 256
  12. 2021FastFlow: Unsupervised Anomaly Detection and Localization via 2D Normalizing Flowscited by 227
  13. 2020Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 221
  14. 2020Same Same But DifferNet: Semi-Supervised Defect Detection with Normalizing Flowscited by 212
  15. 2021The MVTec 3D-AD Dataset for Unsupervised 3D Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 178
  16. 2023EfficientAD: Accurate Visual Anomaly Detection at Millisecond-Level Latenciescited by 160
  17. 2022DeSTSeg: Segmentation Guided Denoising Student-Teacher for Anomaly Detectioncited by 154
  18. 2021Fully Convolutional Cross-Scale-Flows for Image-based Defect Detectioncited by 117
  19. 2022Asymmetric Student-Teacher Networks for Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 117
  20. 2022DSR -- A dual subspace re-projection network for surface anomaly detectioncited by 90
  21. 2021Understanding Failures in Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Generative Modelscited by 89
  22. 2023PyramidFlow: High-Resolution Defect Contrastive Localization using Pyramid Normalizing Flowcited by 74
  23. 2022PNI : Industrial Anomaly Detection using Position and Neighborhood Informationcited by 69
  24. 2022Verifying the Union of Manifolds Hypothesis for Image Datacited by 64
  25. 2022Matching Normalizing Flows and Probability Paths on Manifoldscited by 57
  26. 2024R3D-AD: Reconstruction via Diffusion for 3D Anomaly Detectioncited by 45
  27. 2022Can Push-forward Generative Models Fit Multimodal Distributions?cited by 41
  28. 2020Perfect density models cannot guarantee anomaly detectioncited by 39
  29. 2024GeneralAD: Anomaly Detection Across Domains by Attending to Distorted Featurescited by 29
  30. 2019Understanding the Limitations of Conditional Generative Modelscited by 28
  31. 2025Towards Training-free Anomaly Detection with Vision and Language Foundation Modelscited by 26
  32. 2023MSFlow: Multi-Scale Flow-based Framework for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 25
  33. 2023Target before Shooting: Accurate Anomaly Detection and Localization under One Millisecond via Cascade Patch Retrievalcited by 22
  34. 2024A Geometric Explanation of the Likelihood OOD Detection Paradoxcited by 22
  35. 2022Bridging Mean-Field Games and Normalizing Flows with Trajectory Regularizationcited by 17
  36. 2021Entropic Issues in Likelihood-Based OOD Detectioncited by 16
  37. 2024Continuous Memory Representation for Anomaly Detectioncited by 16
  38. 2023Generating and Reweighting Dense Contrastive Patterns for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 14

50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Flow Mismatching: Unsupervised Anomaly Detection via Velocity Discrepancies in Flow Matching Models
  2. 2024DFM: Interpolant-free Dual Flow Matching
  3. 2025Scalable, Explainable and Provably Robust Anomaly Detection with One-Step Flow Matching
  4. 2025Efficient Flow Matching using Latent Variables
  5. 2026Flow Matching under Noisy Latent Structure: Beyond Exact Low-Dimensional Support
  6. 2026MATCH: Flow Matching for Multi-View Anomaly Detection
  7. 2024DAWN-FM: Data-Aware and Noise-Informed Flow Matching for Solving Inverse Problems
  8. 2026Probabilistic Geodesic Flow Matching on Location-Scale Families