mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mitigating Convergence Collapse in Fixed-Target Anomaly Detectors via Kernel-Anchored Locality Regularization

arXiv 2610.02345 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

A family of tabular anomaly detectors trains a neural map toward a fixed target under squared-error loss and scores anomalies by the test-time residual; contraction matching, one-step rectified flow, and reconstruction autoencoders all fit this template. We characterize a convergence collapse: better optimization makes the detector worse. At convergence, the learned map tracks the target even off-distribution, so the residual signal vanishes on anomalies as well as on normal data. These detectors therefore rely on implicit non-convergence (early stopping, capacity caps) to retain signal. We argue this is structural: effective anomaly detection requires a locality constraint that blocks unconstrained extrapolation. Classical detectors (kNN, KDE, isolation forests, LOF) enforce locality explicitly; fixed-target neural detectors do not. We formalize the connection by showing that the kernel-regression analog of a fixed-target detector is a finite-bandwidth Nadaraya-Watson smoother, which we call Kernel Contraction Matching (KCM). KCM is closed-form, training-free, and CPU-efficient, yet matches established neural baselines on ADBench. Building on this bridge, we introduce the Kernel-Anchored Regularizer (KAR), which penalizes deviation of the neural prediction from a kernel-weighted average of training targets. Across collapse-prone ADBench datasets and three backbones, KAR mitigates collapse and improves AUROC under prolonged training.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Scalable, Explainable and Provably Robust Anomaly Detection with One-Step Flow Matching
  2. 2026TED:Text-Axis Evidence Decomposition for Prompted Anomaly Localization
  3. 2026Mixture Prototype Flow Matching for Open-Set Supervised Anomaly Detection
  4. 2026Keep the Needle, Prune the Haystack: Defect-Preserving Token Pruning for Efficient Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection
  5. 2026Strictly Causal Streaming Video Anomaly Detection with a Theoretically-Grounded State-Space Core
  6. 2026Latent Anomaly Knowledge Excavation: Unveiling Sparse Sensitive Neurons in Vision-Language Models
  7. 2026Augmenting Visual Anomaly Detection with Automated Interpretability
  8. 2026ReFP-AD: Rectified Flow Preconditioning for Energy-Based Anomaly Detection