mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Failure Cases Are Better Learned But Boundary Says Sorry: Facilitating Smooth Perception Change for Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off in Adversarial Training

arXiv 2508.02186 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2025cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial Training (AT) is one of the most effective methods to train robust Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). However, AT creates an inherent trade-off between clean accuracy and adversarial robustness, which is commonly attributed to the more complicated decision boundary caused by the insufficient learning of hard adversarial samples. In this work, we reveal a counterintuitive fact for the first time: From the perspective of perception consistency, hard adversarial samples that can still attack the robust model after AT are already learned better than those successfully defended. Thus, different from previous views, we argue that it is rather the over-sufficient learning of hard adversarial samples that degrades the decision boundary and contributes to the trade-off problem. Specifically, the excessive pursuit of perception consistency would force the model to view the perturbations as noise and ignore the information within them, which should have been utilized to induce a smoother perception transition towards the decision boundary to support its establishment to an appropriate location. In response, we define a new AT objective named Robust Perception, encouraging the model perception to change smoothly with input perturbations, based on which we propose a novel Robust Perception Adversarial Training (RPAT) method, effectively mitigating the current accuracy-robustness trade-off. Experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet with ResNet-18, PreActResNet-18, and WideResNet-34-10 demonstrate the effectiveness of our method beyond four common baselines and 12 state-of-the-art (SOTA) works. The code is available at https://github.com/FlaAI/RPAT.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2025.

Builds on

47 of 60 references.

References · 47

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  6. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  7. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  8. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  9. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,636
  10. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  11. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  12. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
35 more
  1. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
  2. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
  3. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  4. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
  5. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 555
  6. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 520
  7. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 486
  8. 2017Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomizationcited by 383
  9. 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
  10. 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 279
  11. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 200
  12. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  13. 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 194
  14. 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 172
  15. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 149
  16. 2019Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalizationcited by 132
  17. 2020Training robust neural networks using Lipschitz boundscited by 99
  18. 2020CAT: Customized Adversarial Training for Improved Robustnesscited by 61
  19. 2021Better Safe Than Sorry: Preventing Delusive Adversaries with Adversarial Trainingcited by 59
  20. 2021Probabilistic Margins for Instance Reweighting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 57
  21. 2021Exploring Memorization in Adversarial Trainingcited by 55
  22. 2020Once-for-All Adversarial Training: In-Situ Tradeoff between Robustness and Accuracy for Freecited by 48
  23. 2021Consistency Regularization for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 42
  24. 2023Certified Robustness via Dynamic Margin Maximization and Improved Lipschitz Regularizationcited by 21
  25. 2023Balance, Imbalance, and Rebalance: Understanding Robust Overfitting from a Minimax Game Perspectivecited by 18
  26. 2020Lipschitz Bounds and Provably Robust Training by Laplacian Smoothingcited by 17
  27. 2022TSFool: Crafting Highly-Imperceptible Adversarial Time Series through Multi-Objective Attackcited by 9
  28. 2023MERGE: Fast Private Text Generationcited by 9
  29. 2025BackdoorDM: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Backdoor Learning on Diffusion Modelcited by 8
  30. 2022One-vs-the-Rest Loss to Focus on Important Samples in Adversarial Trainingcited by 7
  31. 2023Annealing Self-Distillation Rectification Improves Adversarial Trainingcited by 7
  32. 2021Push Stricter to Decide Better: A Class-Conditional Feature Adaptive Framework for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 6
  33. 2024Conserve-Update-Revise to Cure Generalization and Robustness Trade-off in Adversarial Trainingcited by 6
  34. 2024New Paradigm of Adversarial Training: Releasing Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off via Dummy Classcited by 2
  35. 2024Estimating Neural Network Robustness via Lipschitz Constant and Architecture Sensitivitycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.