mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

New Paradigm of Adversarial Training: Releasing Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off via Dummy Class

arXiv 2410.12671 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2024cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial Training (AT) is one of the most effective methods to enhance the robustness of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). However, existing AT methods suffer from an inherent accuracy-robustness trade-off. Previous works have studied this issue under the current AT paradigm, but still face over 10% accuracy reduction without significant robustness improvement over simple baselines such as PGD-AT. This inherent trade-off raises a question: Whether the current AT paradigm, which assumes to learn corresponding benign and adversarial samples as the same class, inappropriately mixes clean and robust objectives that may be essentially inconsistent. In fact, our empirical results show that up to 40% of CIFAR-10 adversarial samples always fail to satisfy such an assumption across various AT methods and robust models, explicitly indicating the room for improvement of the current AT paradigm. To relax from this overstrict assumption and the tension between clean and robust learning, in this work, we propose a new AT paradigm by introducing an additional dummy class for each original class, aiming to accommodate hard adversarial samples with shifted distribution after perturbation. The robustness w.r.t. these adversarial samples can be achieved by runtime recovery from the predicted dummy classes to the corresponding original ones, without conflicting with the clean objective on accuracy of benign samples. Finally, based on our new paradigm, we propose a novel DUmmy Classes-based Adversarial Training (DUCAT) method that concurrently improves accuracy and robustness in a plug-and-play manner only relevant to logits, loss, and a proposed two-hot soft label-based supervised signal. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) benchmarks, effectively releasing the current trade-off. The code is available at https://github.com/FlaAI/DUCAT.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 63 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.

Builds on

63 of 77 references.

References · 63

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  5. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  6. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  7. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  8. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  9. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
  10. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
  11. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  12. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
38 more
  1. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  2. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
  3. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  4. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 547
  5. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
  6. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
  7. 2021SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 431
  8. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  9. 2017Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomizationcited by 382
  10. 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 333
  11. 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
  12. 2023Tool Learning with Foundation Modelscited by 302
  13. 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 276
  14. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
  15. 2023Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 207
  16. 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 201
  17. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
  18. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  19. 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 171
  20. 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 162
  21. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 148
  22. 2019Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalizationcited by 131
  23. 2021Robust Learning Meets Generative Models: Can Proxy Distributions Improve Adversarial Robustness?cited by 113
  24. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Segment Anything Model for Vision and Beyondcited by 64
  25. 2020CAT: Customized Adversarial Training for Improved Robustnesscited by 61
  26. 2021Better Safe Than Sorry: Preventing Delusive Adversaries with Adversarial Trainingcited by 58
  27. 2021Probabilistic Margins for Instance Reweighting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 57
  28. 2021Exploring Memorization in Adversarial Trainingcited by 55
  29. 2019Mixup Inference: Better Exploiting Mixup to Defend Adversarial Attackscited by 54
  30. 2023CFA: Class-wise Calibrated Fair Adversarial Trainingcited by 53
  31. 2019Robustness to Adversarial Perturbations in Learning from Incomplete Datacited by 49
  32. 2020Once-for-All Adversarial Training: In-Situ Tradeoff between Robustness and Accuracy for Freecited by 48
  33. 2022Efficient and Effective Augmentation Strategy for Adversarial Trainingcited by 43
  34. 2023Data Augmentation Alone Can Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 43
  35. 2021Consistency Regularization for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 42
  36. 2023Improving Generalization of Adversarial Training via Robust Critical Fine-Tuningcited by 23
  37. 2022The Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend: Exploring Inverse Adversaries for Improving Adversarial Trainingcited by 22
  38. 2021Untargeted, Targeted and Universal Adversarial Attacks and Defenses on Time Seriescited by 21

50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.