mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Lipschitz Bounds and Provably Robust Training by Laplacian Smoothing

arXiv 2006.03712 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2020cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work we propose a graph-based learning framework to train models with provable robustness to adversarial perturbations. In contrast to regularization-based approaches, we formulate the adversarially robust learning problem as one of loss minimization with a Lipschitz constraint, and show that the saddle point of the associated Lagrangian is characterized by a Poisson equation with weighted Laplace operator. Further, the weighting for the Laplace operator is given by the Lagrange multiplier for the Lipschitz constraint, which modulates the sensitivity of the minimizer to perturbations. We then design a provably robust training scheme using graph-based discretization of the input space and a primal-dual algorithm to converge to the Lagrangian's saddle point. Our analysis establishes a novel connection between elliptic operators with constraint-enforced weighting and adversarial learning. We also study the complementary problem of improving the robustness of minimizers with a margin on their loss, formulated as a loss-constrained minimization problem of the Lipschitz constant. We propose a technique to obtain robustified minimizers, and evaluate fundamental Lipschitz lower bounds by approaching Lipschitz constant minimization via a sequence of gradient p-norm minimization problems. Ultimately, our results show that, for a desired nominal performance, there exists a fundamental lower bound on the sensitivity to adversarial perturbations that depends only on the loss function and the data distribution, and that improvements in robustness beyond this bound can only be made at the expense of nominal performance. Our training schemes provably achieve these bounds both under constraints on performance and~robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

17 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021CLIP: Cheap Lipschitz Training of Neural Networkscited by 29
  2. 2021Robust Implicit Networks via Non-Euclidean Contractionscited by 19
  3. 2022A Quantitative Geometric Approach to Neural-Network Smoothnesscited by 16
  4. 2023Improving the Robustness of Transformer-based Large Language Models with Dynamic Attentioncited by 10
  5. 2021Adversarial for Good? How the Adversarial ML Community's Values Impede Socially Beneficial Uses of Attackscited by 5
  6. 2022Learning Globally Smooth Functions on Manifoldscited by 4
  7. 2023Gradient Shaping: Enhancing Backdoor Attack Against Reverse Engineeringcited by 4
  8. 2025GeoRecon: Graph-Level Representation Learning for 3D Molecules via Reconstruction-Based Pretrainingcited by 3
  9. 2025Defending against Adversarial Malware Attacks on ML-based Android Malware Detection Systemscited by 2
  10. 2025Failure Cases Are Better Learned But Boundary Says Sorry: Facilitating Smooth Perception Change for Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off in Adversarial Trainingcited by 2
  11. 2022An Overview and Prospective Outlook on Robust Training and Certification of Machine Learning Modelscited by 1
  12. 2023A Hybrid Approach for Smart Alert Generationcited by 1
5 more
  1. 2021Learning Lipschitz Feedback Policies from Expert Demonstrations: Closed-Loop Guarantees, Generalization and Robustnesscited by 0
  2. 2021Robust Adversarial Classification via Abstainingcited by 0
  3. 2024Lipschitz-Regularized Critics Lead to Policy Robustness Against Transition Dynamics Uncertaintycited by 0
  4. 2024Enhance Hyperbolic Representation Learning via Second-order Poolingcited by 0
  5. 2026Beyond Coefficients: Forecast-Necessity Testing for Interpretable Causal Discovery in Nonlinear Time-Series Modelscited by 0