mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Alignment: Harmonizing Clean Accuracy and Adversarial Robustness in Adversarial Training

arXiv 2604.26496 ↗First posted 29 Apr 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial Training (AT) is one of the most effective methods for developing robust deep neural networks (DNNs). However, AT faces a trade-off problem between clean accuracy and adversarial robustness. In this work, we reveal a surprising phenomenon for the first time: Varying input perturbation intensities for training samples near decision boundaries in AT have minimal impact on model robustness. This finding directly exposes the inconsistency between accuracy and robustness score fluctuations, leading us to identify the misalignment between input and latent spaces as a critical driver of the robustness-accuracy trade-off. To mitigate this misalignment for harmonizing accuracy and robustness, we define Robust Alignment as a new AT target, encouraging the model perception to change with input perturbations provided the final label prediction remains unchanged, which can be achieved via two novel ideas. First, we suggest a reduced and fixed perturbation intensity for those boundary samples, which facilitates the model to utilize the perturbations as learnable patterns, instead of noises that complicate decision boundaries meaninglessly. Second, we propose a Domain Interpolation Consistency Adversarial Regularization (DICAR), based on rigorous theoretical derivations, which explicitly introduces semantic alignment between input and latent spaces into AT. Based on these two ideas, we end up with a new Robust Alignment Adversarial Training (RAAT) method, effectively harmonizing accuracy and robustness. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet with ResNet-18, PreActResNet-18, and WideResNet-28-10 demonstrate the effectiveness of RAAT in improving the trade-off beyond four common baselines and a total of 14 related state-of-the-art (SOTA) works.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2026.

Builds on

58 of 75 references.

References · 58

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  8. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  9. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  10. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  11. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  12. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
38 more
  1. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
  2. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,054
  3. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  4. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  5. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  6. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 547
  7. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
  8. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
  9. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
  10. 2016Regularization With Stochastic Transformations and Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 441
  11. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  12. 2017Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomizationcited by 382
  13. 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
  14. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  15. 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 276
  16. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
  17. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
  18. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  19. 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 193
  20. 2018Disentangling Adversarial Robustness and Generalizationcited by 171
  21. 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 171
  22. 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 162
  23. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 148
  24. 2019Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalizationcited by 131
  25. 2019Adversarially Robust Generalization Just Requires More Unlabeled Datacited by 75
  26. 2021Stochastic Training is Not Necessary for Generalizationcited by 63
  27. 2020CAT: Customized Adversarial Training for Improved Robustnesscited by 61
  28. 2021Better Safe Than Sorry: Preventing Delusive Adversaries with Adversarial Trainingcited by 58
  29. 2021Relating Adversarially Robust Generalization to Flat Minimacited by 57
  30. 2021Probabilistic Margins for Instance Reweighting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 57
  31. 2021Exploring Memorization in Adversarial Trainingcited by 55
  32. 2019Robustness to Adversarial Perturbations in Learning from Incomplete Datacited by 49
  33. 2020Once-for-All Adversarial Training: In-Situ Tradeoff between Robustness and Accuracy for Freecited by 48
  34. 2021Consistency Regularization for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 42
  35. 2021Revisiting Consistency Regularization for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 34
  36. 2023Balance, Imbalance, and Rebalance: Understanding Robust Overfitting from a Minimax Game Perspectivecited by 18
  37. 2021Mutual Adversarial Training: Learning together is better than going alonecited by 17
  38. 2023Revisiting and Exploring Efficient Fast Adversarial Training via LAW: Lipschitz Regularization and Auto Weight Averagingcited by 14

50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.