mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multi-Target Multiplicity: Flexibility and Fairness in Target Specification under Resource Constraints

arXiv 2306.13738 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.CYcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prediction models have been widely adopted as the basis for decision-making in domains as diverse as employment, education, lending, and health. Yet, few real world problems readily present themselves as precisely formulated prediction tasks. In particular, there are often many reasonable target variable options. Prior work has argued that this is an important and sometimes underappreciated choice, and has also shown that target choice can have a significant impact on the fairness of the resulting model. However, the existing literature does not offer a formal framework for characterizing the extent to which target choice matters in a particular task. Our work fills this gap by drawing connections between the problem of target choice and recent work on predictive multiplicity. Specifically, we introduce a conceptual and computational framework for assessing how the choice of target affects individuals' outcomes and selection rate disparities across groups. We call this multi-target multiplicity. Along the way, we refine the study of single-target multiplicity by introducing notions of multiplicity that respect resource constraints -- a feature of many real-world tasks that is not captured by existing notions of predictive multiplicity. We apply our methods on a healthcare dataset, and show that the level of multiplicity that stems from target variable choice can be greater than that stemming from nearly-optimal models of a single target.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2023.

Builds on

22 of 40 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 496
  2. 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 373
  3. 2019Measurement and Fairnesscited by 308
  4. 2019Predictive Multiplicity in Classificationcited by 166
  5. 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
  6. 2019Problem Formulation and Fairnesscited by 85
  7. 2020On Counterfactual Explanations under Predictive Multiplicitycited by 74
  8. 2021Characterizing Fairness Over the Set of Good Models Under Selective Labelscited by 65
  9. 2022Rashomon Capacity: A Metric for Predictive Multiplicity in Classificationcited by 47
  10. 2022Predictive Multiplicity in Probabilistic Classificationcited by 44
  11. 2021Leave-one-out Unfairnesscited by 36
  12. 2021Understanding and Improving Fairness-Accuracy Trade-offs in Multi-Task Learningcited by 34
10 more
  1. 2020Participatory Problem Formulation for Fairer Machine Learning Through Community Based System Dynamicscited by 31
  2. 2022A Validity Perspective on Evaluating the Justified Use of Data-driven Decision-making Algorithmscited by 30
  3. 2022The Challenge of Understanding What Users Want: Inconsistent Preferences and Engagement Optimizationcited by 29
  4. 2020From Optimizing Engagement to Measuring Valuecited by 21
  5. 2019Variable Importance Clouds: A Way to Explore Variable Importance for the Set of Good Modelscited by 19
  6. 2021Loss-Aversively Fair Classificationcited by 18
  7. 2022Algorithmic Fairness in Business Analytics: Directions for Research and Practicecited by 18
  8. 2022Net benefit, calibration, threshold selection, and training objectives for algorithmic fairness in healthcarecited by 16
  9. 2022Reconciling Individual Probability Forecastscited by 14
  10. 2022Algorithmic Fairness and Vertical Equity: Income Fairness with IRS Tax Audit Modelscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

11 papers.