mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PII Jailbreaking in LLMs via Activation Steering Reveals Personal Information Leakage

arXiv 2507.02332 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2025cs.CRcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

This paper investigates privacy jailbreaking in LLMs via steering, focusing on whether manipulating activations can bypass LLM alignment and alter response behaviors to privacy related queries (e.g., a certain public figure's sexual orientation). We begin by identifying attention heads predictive of refusal behavior for private attributes (e.g., sexual orientation) using lightweight linear probes trained with privacy evaluator labels. Next, we steer the activations of a small subset of these attention heads guided by the trained probes to induce the model to generate non-refusal responses. Our experiments show that these steered responses often disclose sensitive attribute details, along with other private information about data subjects such as life events, relationships, and personal histories that the models would typically refuse to produce. Evaluations across four LLMs reveal jailbreaking disclosure rates of at least 95%, with more than 50% on average of these responses revealing true personal information. Our controlled study demonstrates that private information memorized in LLMs can be extracted through targeted manipulation of internal activations.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 39 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2025.

Builds on

39 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Towards Inference-time Category-wise Safety Steering for Large Language Models2 Oct
  2. 2024Harmful Fine-tuning Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models: A Survey26 Sep
  3. 2024SCANS: Mitigating the Exaggerated Safety for LLMs via Safety-Conscious Activation Steering21 Aug
  4. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!5 Oct
  5. 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Models3 Oct

Other references · 34

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  3. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  4. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  5. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  6. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  7. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
  8. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
  9. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,420
  10. 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
  11. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
  12. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 878
22 more
  1. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 686
  2. 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 672
  3. 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 518
  4. 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 434
  5. 2024A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreakscited by 385
  6. 2023Multi-step Jailbreaking Privacy Attacks on ChatGPTcited by 333
  7. 2024JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judgescited by 318
  8. 2024TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Modelscited by 285
  9. 2024Rainbow Teaming: Open-Ended Generation of Diverse Adversarial Promptscited by 205
  10. 2022Are Large Pre-Trained Language Models Leaking Your Personal Information?cited by 200
  11. 2024AutoDAN-Turbo: A Lifelong Agent for Strategy Self-Exploration to Jailbreak LLMscited by 199
  12. 2025Understanding Reasoning in Thinking Language Models via Steering Vectorscited by 72
  13. 2024Operationalizing a Threat Model for Red-Teaming Large Language Models (LLMs)cited by 46
  14. 2024Automated Red Teaming with GOAT: the Generative Offensive Agent Testercited by 45
  15. 2024LLM-PBE: Assessing Data Privacy in Large Language Modelscited by 41
  16. 2025Linear Representations of Political Perspective Emerge in Large Language Modelscited by 32
  17. 2024What Features in Prompts Jailbreak LLMs? Investigating the Mechanisms Behind Attackscited by 29
  18. 2023Quantifying Association Capabilities of Large Language Models and Its Implications on Privacy Leakagecited by 28
  19. 2024FactBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for In-the-Wild Language Model Factuality Evaluationcited by 25
  20. 2024PII-Compass: Guiding LLM training data extraction prompts towards the target PII via groundingcited by 24
  21. 2025Fractional Reasoning via Latent Steering Vectors Improves Inference Time Computecited by 14
  22. 2024PII-Scope: A Comprehensive Study on Training Data PII Extraction Attacks in LLMscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025PIG: Privacy Jailbreak Attack on LLMs via Gradient-based Iterative In-Context Optimization
  2. 2025PrivacyXray: Detecting Privacy Breaches in LLMs through Semantic Consistency and Probability Certainty
  3. 2025Uncovering the Persuasive Fingerprint of LLMs in Jailbreaking Attacks
  4. 2026Unintended Memorization of Sensitive Information in Fine-Tuned Language Models
  5. 2025Beyond Jailbreaking: Auditing Contextual Privacy in LLM Agents
  6. 2026On the Privacy of LLMs: An Ablation Study
  7. 2023Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy Via Inference with Large Language Models
  8. 2023Tricking LLMs into Disobedience: Formalizing, Analyzing, and Detecting Jailbreaks