LACUNA: A Testbed for Evaluating Localization Precision for LLM Unlearning
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
LLMs memorize sensitive training data, including personally identifiable information (PII), creating a pressing need for reliable post hoc removal methods. Unlearning has emerged as a promising solution, with state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods often following a localize-first, unlearn-second paradigm that targets specific model parameters. However, existing benchmarks evaluate unlearning solely at the output level, leaving open the question of whether unlearning truly erases knowledge from a model's parameters or merely obfuscates it, a concern reinforced by the success of resurfacing attacks. To bridge this gap, we introduce LACUNA: the first unlearning testbed with ground-truth parameter-level localization. LACUNA injects PII of synthetic individuals into predefined parameters of 1B and 7B OLMo-based models via masked continual pretraining, enabling direct evaluation of whether unlearning targets the weights responsible for knowledge storage. We use LACUNA to benchmark current SOTA unlearning methods and find that, despite strong output-level performance, existing methods are highly imprecise and susceptible to resurfacing attacks. We further show that when localization is successful, even a simple gradient-based unlearning method achieves strong erasure and robustness to resurfacing attacks, highlighting the importance of precise unlearning. We release LACUNA to complement behavioral evaluations and drive further advances in robust, localization-based unlearning.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 45 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.
Builds on
45 of 55 references.
Closest ancestors · 23
Same direction, newest first
- 2026REBEL: Hidden Knowledge Recovery via Evolutionary-Based Evaluation Loop5 Feb
- 2025Beyond Data Filtering: Knowledge Localization for Capability Removal in LLMs5 Dec
- 2025OpenUnlearning: Accelerating LLM Unlearning via Unified Benchmarking of Methods and Metrics14 Jun
- 2025BLUR: A Benchmark for LLM Unlearning Robust to Forget-Retain Overlap28 May
- 2025Editing as Unlearning: Are Knowledge Editing Methods Strong Baselines for Large Language Model Unlearning?26 May
- 2025Unlearning Isn't Deletion: Investigating Reversibility of Machine Unlearning in LLMs22 May
- 2025Does Localization Inform Unlearning? A Rigorous Examination of Local Parameter Attribution for Knowledge Unlearning in Language Models22 May
- 2025Unlearning vs. Obfuscation: Are We Truly Removing Knowledge?5 May
- 2025Not All Data Are Unlearned Equally7 Apr
- 2024Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning9 Oct
- 2024MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Models8 Jul
- 2024To Forget or Not? Towards Practical Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models2 Jul
11 more
- 2024How Data Inter-connectivity Shapes LLMs Unlearning: A Structural Unlearning Perspective24 Jun
- 2024Unlearning or Obfuscating? Jogging the Memory of Unlearned LLMs via Benign Relearning19 Jun
- 2024Intrinsic Test of Unlearning Using Parametric Knowledge Traces17 Jun
- 2024RWKU: Benchmarking Real-World Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models16 Jun
- 2024Reconstruction Attacks on Machine Unlearning: Simple Models are Vulnerable30 May
- 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
- 2024Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models13 Feb
- 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
- 2023Large Language Model Unlearning14 Oct
- 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMs3 Oct
- 2022Continual Learning and Private Unlearning24 Mar
Other references · 22
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
- 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 976
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
- 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
- 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 488
10 more
- 20242 OLMo 2 Furiouscited by 302
- 2023Analyzing Leakage of Personally Identifiable Information in Language Modelscited by 278
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extractioncited by 264
- 2023Does Localization Inform Editing? Surprising Differences in Causality-Based Localization vs. Knowledge Editing in Language Modelscited by 237
- 2023Do Localization Methods Actually Localize Memorized Data in LLMs? A Tale of Two Benchmarkscited by 29
- 2024Gradient Routing: Masking Gradients to Localize Computation in Neural Networkscited by 28
- 2024PII-Compass: Guiding LLM training data extraction prompts towards the target PII via groundingcited by 22
- 2025Privacy Ripple Effects from Adding or Removing Personal Information in Language Model Trainingcited by 9
- 2025PANORAMA: A synthetic PII-laced dataset for studying sensitive data memorization in LLMscited by 6
- 2025PII Jailbreaking in LLMs via Activation Steering Reveals Personal Information Leakagecited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.