mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unintended Memorization of Sensitive Information in Fine-Tuned Language Models

arXiv 2601.17480 ↗First posted 24 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) on sensitive datasets carries a substantial risk of unintended memorization and leakage of Personally Identifiable Information (PII), which can violate privacy regulations and compromise individual safety. In this work, we systematically investigate a critical and underexplored vulnerability: the exposure of PII that appears only in model inputs, not in training targets. Using both synthetic and real-world datasets, we design controlled extraction probes to quantify unintended PII memorization and study how factors such as language, PII frequency, task type, and model size influence memorization behavior. We further benchmark four privacy-preserving approaches including differential privacy, machine unlearning, regularization, and preference alignment, evaluating their trade-offs between privacy and task performance. Our results show that post-training methods generally provide more consistent privacy-utility trade-offs, while differential privacy achieves strong reduction in leakage in specific settings, although it can introduce training instability. These findings highlight the persistent challenge of memorization in fine-tuned LLMs and emphasize the need for robust, scalable privacy-preserving techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2026.

Builds on

15 of 28 references.

References · 15

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  2. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  3. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
  4. 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
  5. 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 434
  6. 2021Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learnerscited by 412
  7. 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 400
  8. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 383
  9. 2023Analyzing Leakage of Personally Identifiable Information in Language Modelscited by 285
  10. 2024MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Modelscited by 261
  11. 2024Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearningcited by 172
  12. 2025How much do language models memorize?cited by 61
3 more
  1. 2024PII-Compass: Guiding LLM training data extraction prompts towards the target PII via groundingcited by 24
  2. 2025Unifying Re-Identification, Attribute Inference, and Data Reconstruction Risks in Differential Privacycited by 15
  3. 2024PII-Scope: A Comprehensive Study on Training Data PII Extraction Attacks in LLMscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Private Memorization Editing: Turning Memorization into a Defense to Strengthen Data Privacy in Large Language Models
  2. 2024Efficient and Private: Memorisation under differentially private parameter-efficient fine-tuning in language models
  3. 2024Undesirable Memorization in Large Language Models: A Survey
  4. 2025Impact of Fine-Tuning Methods on Memorization in Large Language Models
  5. 2022Memorization in NLP Fine-tuning Methods
  6. 2023What can we learn from Data Leakage and Unlearning for Law?
  7. 2025The Landscape of Memorization in LLMs: Mechanisms, Measurement, and Mitigation
  8. 2026Do LLMs Really Memorize Personally Identifiable Information? Revisiting PII Leakage with a Cue-Controlled Memorization Framework