mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fractional Reasoning via Latent Steering Vectors Improves Inference Time Compute

arXiv 2506.15882 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 14

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Test-time compute has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving the performance of large language models (LLMs), where generating multiple outputs or refining individual chains can significantly boost answer accuracy. However, existing methods like Best-of-N, majority voting, and self-reflection typically apply reasoning in a uniform way across inputs, overlooking the fact that different problems may require different levels of reasoning depth. In this work, we propose Fractional Reasoning, a training-free and model-agnostic framework that enables continuous control over reasoning intensity at inference time, going beyond the limitations of fixed instructional prompts. Our method operates by extracting the latent steering vector associated with deeper reasoning and reapplying it with a tunable scaling factor, allowing the model to tailor its reasoning process to the complexity of each input. This supports two key modes of test-time scaling: (1) improving output quality in breadth-based strategies (e.g., Best-of-N, majority voting), and (2) enhancing the correctness of individual reasoning chains in depth-based strategies (e.g., self-reflection). Experiments on GSM8K, MATH500, and GPQA demonstrate that Fractional Reasoning consistently improves performance across diverse reasoning tasks and models.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2025.

Builds on

14 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025THOUGHTTERMINATOR: Benchmarking, Calibrating, and Mitigating Overthinking in Reasoning Models17 Apr
  2. 2024Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs30 Dec
  3. 2023Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies6 Aug

Other references · 11

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  4. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  6. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  7. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
  8. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
  9. 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,210
  10. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 901
  11. 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 441

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 7.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Prompting Test-Time Scaling Is A Strong LLM Reasoning Data Augmentation
  2. 2025Parallel Test-Time Scaling for Latent Reasoning Models
  3. 2025Seek in the Dark: Reasoning via Test-Time Instance-Level Policy Gradient in Latent Space
  4. 2025Rethinking Inference-Time Scaling: Efficiency Limits and Linguistic Signals
  5. 2025Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approach
  6. 2025Revisiting Test-Time Scaling: A Survey and a Diversity-Aware Method for Efficient Reasoning
  7. 2025Encode, Think, Decode: Scaling test-time reasoning with recursive latent thoughts
  8. 2026ATLAS: Verifier-Guided Adaptive Latent Activation Steering for Efficient LLM Reasoning