mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MARBLE: A Hard Benchmark for Multimodal Spatial Reasoning and Planning

arXiv 2506.22992 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2025cs.AI cs.CL cs.CVcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

The ability to process information from multiple modalities and to reason through it step-by-step remains a critical challenge in advancing artificial intelligence. However, existing reasoning benchmarks focus on text-only reasoning, or employ multimodal questions that can be answered by directly retrieving information from a non-text modality. Thus, complex reasoning remains poorly understood in multimodal domains. Here, we present MARBLE, a challenging multimodal reasoning benchmark that is designed to scrutinize multimodal language models (MLLMs) in their ability to carefully reason step-by-step through complex multimodal problems and environments. MARBLE is composed of two highly challenging tasks, M-Portal and M-Cube, that require the crafting and understanding of multistep plans under spatial, visual, and physical constraints. We find that current MLLMs perform poorly on MARBLE -- all the 12 advanced models obtain near-random performance on M-Portal and 0% accuracy on M-Cube. Only in simplified subtasks some models outperform the random baseline, indicating that complex reasoning is still a challenge for existing MLLMs. Moreover, we show that perception remains a bottleneck, where MLLMs occasionally fail to extract information from the visual inputs. By shedding a light on the limitations of MLLMs, we hope that MARBLE will spur the development of the next generation of models with the ability to reason and plan across many, multimodal reasoning steps.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 25 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2025.

Builds on

25 of 27 references.

References · 25

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  3. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  4. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  5. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  6. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  7. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,669
  8. 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
  9. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
  10. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,769
  11. 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,582
  12. 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 719
13 more
  1. 2025Seed1.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 367
  2. 2025Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 176
  3. 2024Vision language models are blind: Failing to translate detailed visual features into wordscited by 144
  4. 2024BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Gamescited by 141
  5. 2025Can MLLMs Reason in Multimodality? EMMA: An Enhanced MultiModal ReAsoning Benchmarkcited by 132
  6. 2024ARC Prize 2024: Technical Reportcited by 103
  7. 2024PuzzleVQA: Diagnosing Multimodal Reasoning Challenges of Language Models with Abstract Visual Patternscited by 54
  8. 2024Critic-V: VLM Critics Help Catch VLM Errors in Multimodal Reasoningcited by 50
  9. 2024MEGA-Bench: Scaling Multimodal Evaluation to over 500 Real-World Taskscited by 41
  10. 2025Multimodal Inconsistency Reasoning (MMIR): A New Benchmark for Multimodal Reasoning Modelscited by 24
  11. 2024Evaluating Large Language Models with Grid-Based Game Competitions: An Extensible LLM Benchmark and Leaderboardcited by 22
  12. 2025V-MAGE: A Game Evaluation Framework for Assessing Vision-Centric Capabilities in Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 10
  13. 2024A Surprising Failure? Multimodal LLMs and the NLVR Challengecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Multimodal Spatial Reasoning in the Large Model Era: A Survey and Benchmarks
  2. 2025Scaling and Beyond: Advancing Spatial Reasoning in MLLMs Requires New Recipes
  3. 2025Spatial Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey of Tasks, Benchmarks and Methods
  4. 2026LAST: Leveraging Tools as Hints to Enhance Spatial Reasoning for Multimodal Large Language Models
  5. 2025LEGO-Puzzles: How Good Are MLLMs at Multi-Step Spatial Reasoning?
  6. 2025Cube Bench: A Benchmark for Spatial Visual Reasoning in MLLMs
  7. 2025SpatialBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Spatial Cognition
  8. 2025MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial Intelligence