SFNet: Fusion of Spatial and Frequency-Domain Features for Remote Sensing Image Forgery Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence is producing fake remote sensing imagery (RSI) that is increasingly difficult to detect, potentially leading to erroneous intelligence, fake news, and even conspiracy theories. Existing forgery detection methods typically rely on single visual features to capture predefined artifacts, such as spatial-domain cues to detect forged objects like roads or buildings in RSI, or frequency-domain features to identify artifacts from up-sampling operations in adversarial generative networks (GANs). However, the nature of artifacts can significantly differ depending on geographic terrain, land cover types, or specific features within the RSI. Moreover, these complex artifacts evolve as generative models become more sophisticated. In short, over-reliance on a single visual cue makes existing forgery detectors struggle to generalize across diverse remote sensing data. This paper proposed a novel forgery detection framework called SFNet, designed to identify fake images in diverse remote sensing data by leveraging spatial and frequency domain features. Specifically, to obtain rich and comprehensive visual information, SFNet employs two independent feature extractors to capture spatial and frequency domain features from input RSIs. To fully utilize the complementary domain features, the domain feature mapping module and the hybrid domain feature refinement module(CBAM attention) of SFNet are designed to successively align and fuse the multi-domain features while suppressing redundant information. Experiments on three datasets show that SFNet achieves an accuracy improvement of 4%-15.18% over the state-of-the-art RS forgery detection methods and exhibits robust generalization capabilities. The code is available at https://github.com/GeoX-Lab/RSTI/tree/main/SFNet.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2025.
Builds on
47 of 76 references.
References · 47
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
35 more
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,988
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
- 2018CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Modulecited by 2,477
- 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
- 2020Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videoscited by 632
- 2019ECA-Net: Efficient Channel Attention for Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
- 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 523
- 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 504
- 2018Exposing DeepFake Videos By Detecting Face Warping Artifactscited by 319
- 2018Exposing Deep Fakes Using Inconsistent Head Posescited by 297
- 2019Detecting and Simulating Artifacts in GAN Fake Imagescited by 293
- 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 280
- 2020What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalizecited by 273
- 2023Text-to-image Diffusion Models in Generative AI: A Surveycited by 265
- 2021Generalizing Face Forgery Detection with High-frequency Featurescited by 262
- 2021Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domaincited by 244
- 2022A Survey on Generative Diffusion Modelcited by 240
- 2020FcaNet: Frequency Channel Attention Networkscited by 179
- 2018BAM: Bottleneck Attention Modulecited by 172
- 2021Conformer: Local Features Coupling Global Representations for Visual Recognitioncited by 164
- 2020DeepFaceLab: Integrated, flexible and extensible face-swapping frameworkcited by 131
- 2022An Empirical Study of Remote Sensing Pretrainingcited by 105
- 2021Local Relation Learning for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 100
- 2023Art and the science of generative AI: A deeper divecited by 95
- 2021Deepfake Video Detection Using Convolutional Vision Transformercited by 79
- 2022FrePGAN: Robust Deepfake Detection Using Frequency-level Perturbationscited by 75
- 2021BiHPF: Bilateral High-Pass Filters for Robust Deepfake Detectioncited by 60
- 2021ADD: Frequency Attention and Multi-View based Knowledge Distillation to Detect Low-Quality Compressed Deepfake Imagescited by 48
- 2022TOV: The Original Vision Model for Optical Remote Sensing Image Understanding via Self-supervised Learningcited by 35
- 2018Satellite Image Forgery Detection and Localization Using GAN and One-Class Classifiercited by 14
- 2022A Review of Deep Learning-based Approaches for Deepfake Content Detectioncited by 13
- 2024Image Fusion in Remote Sensing: An Overview and Meta Analysiscited by 10
- 2021Geo-DefakeHop: High-Performance Geographic Fake Image Detectioncited by 9
- 2024From Text to Pixel: Advancing Long-Context Understanding in MLLMscited by 9
- 2024Generative AI in Vision: A Survey on Models, Metrics and Applicationscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.