mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TGDPO: Harnessing Token-Level Reward Guidance for Enhancing Direct Preference Optimization

arXiv 2506.14574 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in reinforcement learning from human feedback have shown that utilizing fine-grained token-level reward models can substantially enhance the performance of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) in aligning large language models. However, it is challenging to leverage such token-level reward as guidance for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), since DPO is formulated as a sequence-level bandit problem. To address this challenge, this work decomposes the sequence-level PPO into a sequence of token-level proximal policy optimization problems and then frames the problem of token-level PPO with token-level reward guidance, from which closed-form optimal token-level policy and the corresponding token-level reward can be derived. Using the obtained reward and Bradley-Terry model, this work establishes a framework of computable loss functions with token-level reward guidance for DPO, and proposes a practical reward guidance based on the induced DPO reward. This formulation enables different tokens to exhibit varying degrees of deviation from reference policy based on their respective rewards. Experiment results demonstrate that our method achieves substantial performance improvements over DPO, with win rate gains of up to 7.5 points on MT-Bench, 6.2 points on AlpacaEval 2, and 4.3 points on Arena-Hard. Code is available at https://github.com/dvlab-research/TGDPO.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 25 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2025.

Builds on

25 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Earlier Tokens Contribute More: Learning Direct Preference Optimization From Temporal Decay Perspective20 Feb
  2. 2024Aligning CodeLLMs with Direct Preference Optimization24 Oct
  3. 2024Unpacking DPO and PPO: Disentangling Best Practices for Learning from Preference Feedback13 Jun
  4. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
  5. 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function18 Apr
  6. 2024Token-level Direct Preference Optimization18 Apr
  7. 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization28 Mar
  8. 2023Preference-grounded Token-level Guidance for Language Model Fine-tuning1 Jun
  9. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 16

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  3. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  4. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
  5. 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,136
  6. 2023LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusioncited by 564
  7. 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 406
  8. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 401
  9. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 376
  10. 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 221
  11. 2022Offline RL for Natural Language Generation with Implicit Language Q Learningcited by 138
  12. 2024DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHFcited by 127
4 more
  1. 2019On the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 82
  2. 2024A Dense Reward View on Aligning Text-to-Image Diffusion with Preferencecited by 55
  3. 2024Inverse-Q*: Token Level Reinforcement Learning for Aligning Large Language Models Without Preference Datacited by 12
  4. 2025Segmenting Text and Learning Their Rewards for Improved RLHF in Language Modelcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Pre-DPO: Improving Data Utilization in Direct Preference Optimization Using a Guiding Reference Model
  2. 2024Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study
  3. 2024Minor DPO reject penalty to increase training robustness
  4. 2025Reveal the Mystery of DPO: The Connection between DPO and RL Algorithms
  5. 2024AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference Optimization
  6. 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization
  7. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Direct Preference Optimization: Datasets, Theories, Variants, and Applications
  8. 2026Boosting Direct Preference Optimization with Penalization