mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Earlier Tokens Contribute More: Learning Direct Preference Optimization From Temporal Decay Perspective

arXiv 2502.14340 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 11

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has gained attention as an efficient alternative to reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Despite its advantages, DPO suffers from a length bias, generating responses longer than those from the reference model. Existing solutions like SimPO and SamPO address this issue but uniformly treat the contribution of rewards across sequences, overlooking temporal dynamics. To this end, we propose an enhanced preference optimization method that incorporates a temporal decay factor controlled by a gamma parameter. This dynamic weighting mechanism adjusts the influence of each reward based on its position in the sequence, prioritizing earlier tokens that are more critical for alignment. By adaptively focusing on more relevant feedback, our approach mitigates overfitting to less pertinent data and remains responsive to evolving human preferences. Experimental results on several benchmarks show that our approach consistently outperforms vanilla DPO by 5.9-8.8 points on AlpacaEval 2 and 3.3-9.7 points on Arena-Hard across different model architectures and sizes. Furthermore, additional experiments on mathematical and reasoning benchmarks (MMLU, GSM8K, and MATH) confirm that our method enhances performance without compromising general capabilities. Our codebase would be available at urlhttps://github.com/LotuSrc/D2PO.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 2 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2025.

Builds on

2 of 49 references.

References · 2

  1. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  2. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 9; 2026: 2.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization
  2. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Direct Preference Optimization: Datasets, Theories, Variants, and Applications
  3. 2024AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference Optimization
  4. 2024New Desiderata for Direct Preference Optimization
  5. 2025Pre-DPO: Improving Data Utilization in Direct Preference Optimization Using a Guiding Reference Model
  6. 2024Triple Preference Optimization: Achieving Better Alignment using a Single Step Optimization
  7. 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset
  8. 2026From RLHF to Direct Alignment: A Theoretical Unification of Preference Learning for Large Language Models