mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Pre-DPO: Improving Data Utilization in Direct Preference Optimization Using a Guiding Reference Model

arXiv 2504.15843 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2025cs.CLcited by 6

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplifies reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) for large language models (LLMs) by directly optimizing human preferences without an explicit reward model. We find that during DPO training, the reference model plays the role of a data weight adjuster. However, the common practice of initializing the policy and reference models identically in DPO can lead to inefficient data utilization and impose a performance ceiling. Meanwhile, the lack of a reference model in Simple Preference Optimization (SimPO) reduces training robustness and necessitates stricter conditions to prevent catastrophic forgetting. In this work, we propose Pre-DPO, a simple yet effective DPO-based training paradigm that enhances preference optimization performance by leveraging a guiding reference model. This reference model provides foresight into the optimal policy state achievable through the training preference data, serving as a guiding mechanism that adaptively assigns higher weights to samples more suitable for the model and lower weights to those less suitable. Extensive experiments on AlpacaEval 2.0 and Arena-Hard v0.1 benchmarks demonstrate that Pre-DPO consistently improves the performance of both DPO and SimPO, without relying on external models or additional data.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 31 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2025.

Builds on

31 of 41 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Principled Data Selection for Alignment: The Hidden Risks of Difficult Examples11 Feb
  2. 2024Understanding Reference Policies in Direct Preference Optimization18 Jul
  3. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
  4. 2024Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment15 Apr
  5. 2024sDPO: Don't Use Your Data All at Once28 Mar
  6. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
  7. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation16 Jan
  8. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  9. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 22

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  6. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  7. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  9. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,823
  10. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
  11. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
  12. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
10 more
  1. 2025Qwen2.5-Omni Technical Reportcited by 736
  2. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 675
  3. 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 642
  4. 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 500
  5. 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 406
  6. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 376
  7. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraintcited by 350
  8. 2024Direct Nash Optimization: Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve with General Preferencescited by 178
  9. 2024Iterative Nash Policy Optimization: Aligning LLMs with General Preferences via No-Regret Learningcited by 45
  10. 2025Exploring Data Scaling Trends and Effects in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 26

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024New Desiderata for Direct Preference Optimization
  2. 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization
  3. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Direct Preference Optimization: Datasets, Theories, Variants, and Applications
  4. 2024Minor DPO reject penalty to increase training robustness
  5. 2024Filtered Direct Preference Optimization
  6. 2025Active Learning for Direct Preference Optimization
  7. 2024Mixed Preference Optimization: Reinforcement Learning with Data Selection and Better Reference Model
  8. 2024AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference Optimization