mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

NAP-Tuning: Neural Augmented Prompt Tuning for Adversarially Robust Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2506.12706 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) such as CLIP have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding relationships between visual and textual data through joint embedding spaces. Despite their effectiveness, these models remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, particularly in the image modality, posing significant security concerns. Building upon our previous work on Adversarial Prompt Tuning (AdvPT), which introduced learnable text prompts to enhance adversarial robustness in VLMs without extensive parameter training, we present a significant extension by introducing the Neural Augmentor framework for Multi-modal Adversarial Prompt Tuning (NAP-Tuning).Our key innovations include: (1) extending AdvPT from text-only to multi-modal prompting across both text and visual modalities, (2) expanding from single-layer to multi-layer prompt architectures, and (3) proposing a novel architecture-level redesign through our Neural Augmentor approach, which implements feature purification to directly address the distortions introduced by adversarial attacks in feature space. Our NAP-Tuning approach incorporates token refiners that learn to reconstruct purified features through residual connections, allowing for modality-specific and layer-specific feature correction.Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that NAP-Tuning significantly outperforms existing methods across various datasets and attack types. Notably, our approach shows significant improvements over the strongest baselines under the challenging AutoAttack benchmark, outperforming them by 33.5% on ViT-B16 and 33.0% on ViT-B32 architectures while maintaining competitive clean accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 32 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2025.

Builds on

32 of 43 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025R-TPT: Improving Adversarial Robustness of Vision-Language Models through Test-Time Prompt Tuning15 Apr
  2. 2025A Frustratingly Simple Yet Highly Effective Attack Baseline: Over 90% Success Rate Against the Strong Black-box Models of GPT-4.5/4o/o113 Mar
  3. 2024Adversarial Prompt Distillation for Vision-Language Models22 Nov
  4. 2024TAPT: Test-Time Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Robust Inference in Vision-Language Models20 Nov
  5. 2024Few-Shot Adversarial Prompt Learning on Vision-Language Models21 Mar
  6. 2023Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models19 Nov
  7. 2022Understanding Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness for Large-Scale Models14 Dec

Other references · 25

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  5. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  6. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  7. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  8. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,281
  9. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  10. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  11. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  12. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
13 more
  1. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  2. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,433
  3. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 689
  4. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 687
  5. 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 599
  6. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  7. 2021Enhancing the Transferability of Adversarial Attacks through Variance Tuningcited by 244
  8. 2020Eigen-CAM: Class Activation Map using Principal Componentscited by 189
  9. 2023Rethinking Model Ensemble in Transfer-based Adversarial Attackscited by 89
  10. 2024PromptKD: Unsupervised Prompt Distillation for Vision-Language Modelscited by 72
  11. 2025CLIP is Strong Enough to Fight Back: Test-time Counterattacks towards Zero-shot Adversarial Robustness of CLIPcited by 23
  12. 2023Improved Visual Fine-tuning with Natural Language Supervisioncited by 7
  13. 2021ImageNet Pre-training also Transfers Non-Robustnesscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024One Prompt Word is Enough to Boost Adversarial Robustness for Pre-trained Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026Towards Fine-Grained Robustness: Attention-Guided Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025MoAPT: Mixture of Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026SS-TPT: Stability and Suitability-Guided Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Adversarially Robust Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026Closed-Loop Bidirectional Prompting for Adversarial Robustness of Vision Language Models
  6. 2026Learning What Not to Learn: Adversarial Disentangled Prompt Tuning for Robust Vision-Language Models
  7. 2024Generalizable Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  8. 2024Revisiting the Robust Generalization of Adversarial Prompt Tuning