mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MoAPT: Mixture of Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2505.17509 ↗First posted 23 May 2025cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large pre-trained Vision Language Models (VLMs) demonstrate excellent generalization capabilities but remain highly susceptible to adversarial examples, posing potential security risks. To improve the robustness of VLMs against adversarial examples, adversarial prompt tuning methods are proposed to align the text feature with the adversarial image feature without changing model parameters. However, when facing various adversarial attacks, a single learnable text prompt has insufficient generalization to align well with all adversarial image features, which ultimately results in overfitting. To address the above challenge, in this paper, we empirically find that increasing the number of learned prompts yields greater robustness improvements than simply extending the length of a single prompt. Building on this observation, we propose an adversarial tuning method named Mixture of Adversarial Prompt Tuning (MoAPT) to enhance the generalization against various adversarial attacks for VLMs. MoAPT aims to learn mixture text prompts to obtain more robust text features. To further enhance the adaptability, we propose a conditional weight router based on the adversarial images to predict the mixture weights of multiple learned prompts, which helps obtain sample-specific mixture text features aligning with different adversarial image features. Extensive experiments across 11 datasets under different settings show that our method can achieve better adversarial robustness than state-of-the-art approaches.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 30 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2025.

Builds on

30 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Adversarial Prompt Distillation for Vision-Language Models22 Nov
  2. 2024TAPT: Test-Time Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Robust Inference in Vision-Language Models20 Nov
  3. 2024Text-Guided Attention is All You Need for Zero-Shot Robustness in Vision-Language Models29 Oct
  4. 2024Few-Shot Adversarial Prompt Learning on Vision-Language Models21 Mar
  5. 2024One Prompt Word is Enough to Boost Adversarial Robustness for Pre-trained Vision-Language Models4 Mar
  6. 2024Robust CLIP: Unsupervised Adversarial Fine-Tuning of Vision Embeddings for Robust Large Vision-Language Models19 Feb
  7. 2024Pre-trained Model Guided Fine-Tuning for Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness9 Jan
  8. 2023Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models19 Nov
  9. 2022Understanding Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness for Large-Scale Models14 Dec

Other references · 21

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  4. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  5. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  6. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,281
  7. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  8. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  9. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
  10. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  11. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  12. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,433
9 more
  1. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 689
  2. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 687
  3. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 685
  4. 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 334
  5. 2024A Survey on Mixture of Experts in Large Language Modelscited by 237
  6. 2022Prompt Distribution Learningcited by 235
  7. 2023On the Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Modal Foundation Modelscited by 145
  8. 2022Visual Prompting for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 34
  9. 2023Adversarial Attacks on Foundational Vision Modelscited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025NAP-Tuning: Neural Augmented Prompt Tuning for Adversarially Robust Vision-Language Models
  2. 2024Revisiting the Robust Generalization of Adversarial Prompt Tuning
  3. 2026Learning What Not to Learn: Adversarial Disentangled Prompt Tuning for Robust Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025R-TPT: Improving Adversarial Robustness of Vision-Language Models through Test-Time Prompt Tuning
  5. 2025FedAPT: Federated Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024Can Better Text Semantics in Prompt Tuning Improve VLM Generalization?
  7. 2026TAME: Test-Time Adversarial Prompt Tuning via Mixture-of-Experts for Vision-Language Models
  8. 2026Answer It or Not? Towards Prompt-Adapted Adversarial Images on Vision Language Models