Learning What Not to Learn: Adversarial Disentangled Prompt Tuning for Robust Vision-Language Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
While adversarial prompt tuning can enhance robustness of vision-language models efficiently, we find that existing methods aggravate robust generalization overfitting on seen classes, leading to a rapid degradation in performance against adversarial examples of unseen classes as training progresses. We empirically identify that this degradation stems from the tendency of the model to learn pseudo-robust features (i.e., non-generalizable shortcuts). To mitigate this, we propose ADAPT (Adversarial Disentangled Prompt Tuning), a robust prompt tuning framework following the philosophy of ``Learning What Not to Learn''. Specifically, ADAPT uses a dual-prompt mechanism with a target prompt and a pool of decoy prompts. During training, the decoy prompts are guided to entrap diverse pseudo-robust features, while the target prompt is constrained to be orthogonal to the decoys in the embedding space to learn robust features. By disentangling the robust features from the pseudo-robust features, ADAPT effectively prevents robust generalization overfitting. We further provide an analysis showing that the orthogonal loss bounds the effect of shifts in pseudo-robust features on unseen classes, yielding a testing error guarantee. Empirically, extensive experiments demonstrate that ADAPT substantially improves the robustness of the target prompt on unseen classes. The code is available at https://github.com/cheny02/ADAPT-ACMMM2026.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 21 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.
Builds on
21 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025R-TPT: Improving Adversarial Robustness of Vision-Language Models through Test-Time Prompt Tuning15 Apr
- 2024Pre-trained Model Guided Fine-Tuning for Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness9 Jan
Other references · 19
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
- 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 798
7 more
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
- 2024Long-CLIP: Unlocking the Long-Text Capability of CLIPcited by 300
- 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
- 2023On the Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Modal Foundation Modelscited by 145
- 2024EVA-CLIP-18B: Scaling CLIP to 18 Billion Parameterscited by 99
- 2023Does Physical Adversarial Example Really Matter to Autonomous Driving? Towards System-Level Effect of Adversarial Object Evasion Attackcited by 37
- 2026CLCR: Cross-Level Semantic Collaborative Representation for Multimodal Learningcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024One Prompt Word is Enough to Boost Adversarial Robustness for Pre-trained Vision-Language Models
- 2024Revisiting the Robust Generalization of Adversarial Prompt Tuning
- 2026SS-TPT: Stability and Suitability-Guided Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Adversarially Robust Vision-Language Models
- 2026Closed-Loop Bidirectional Prompting for Adversarial Robustness of Vision Language Models
- 2023Towards Robust Prompts on Vision-Language Models
- 2025NAP-Tuning: Neural Augmented Prompt Tuning for Adversarially Robust Vision-Language Models
- 2025Robust Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models with Mild Semantic Noise
- 2026What Makes VLMs Robust? Towards Reconciling Robustness and Accuracy in Vision-Language Models