mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning What Not to Learn: Adversarial Disentangled Prompt Tuning for Robust Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2608.17306 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

While adversarial prompt tuning can enhance robustness of vision-language models efficiently, we find that existing methods aggravate robust generalization overfitting on seen classes, leading to a rapid degradation in performance against adversarial examples of unseen classes as training progresses. We empirically identify that this degradation stems from the tendency of the model to learn pseudo-robust features (i.e., non-generalizable shortcuts). To mitigate this, we propose ADAPT (Adversarial Disentangled Prompt Tuning), a robust prompt tuning framework following the philosophy of ``Learning What Not to Learn''. Specifically, ADAPT uses a dual-prompt mechanism with a target prompt and a pool of decoy prompts. During training, the decoy prompts are guided to entrap diverse pseudo-robust features, while the target prompt is constrained to be orthogonal to the decoys in the embedding space to learn robust features. By disentangling the robust features from the pseudo-robust features, ADAPT effectively prevents robust generalization overfitting. We further provide an analysis showing that the orthogonal loss bounds the effect of shifts in pseudo-robust features on unseen classes, yielding a testing error guarantee. Empirically, extensive experiments demonstrate that ADAPT substantially improves the robustness of the target prompt on unseen classes. The code is available at https://github.com/cheny02/ADAPT-ACMMM2026.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 21 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.

Builds on

21 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025R-TPT: Improving Adversarial Robustness of Vision-Language Models through Test-Time Prompt Tuning15 Apr
  2. 2024Pre-trained Model Guided Fine-Tuning for Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness9 Jan

Other references · 19

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  5. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  6. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  7. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  8. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  9. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  10. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  11. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
  12. 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 798
7 more
  1. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
  2. 2024Long-CLIP: Unlocking the Long-Text Capability of CLIPcited by 300
  3. 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
  4. 2023On the Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Modal Foundation Modelscited by 145
  5. 2024EVA-CLIP-18B: Scaling CLIP to 18 Billion Parameterscited by 99
  6. 2023Does Physical Adversarial Example Really Matter to Autonomous Driving? Towards System-Level Effect of Adversarial Object Evasion Attackcited by 37
  7. 2026CLCR: Cross-Level Semantic Collaborative Representation for Multimodal Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024One Prompt Word is Enough to Boost Adversarial Robustness for Pre-trained Vision-Language Models
  2. 2024Revisiting the Robust Generalization of Adversarial Prompt Tuning
  3. 2026SS-TPT: Stability and Suitability-Guided Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Adversarially Robust Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026Closed-Loop Bidirectional Prompting for Adversarial Robustness of Vision Language Models
  5. 2023Towards Robust Prompts on Vision-Language Models
  6. 2025NAP-Tuning: Neural Augmented Prompt Tuning for Adversarially Robust Vision-Language Models
  7. 2025Robust Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models with Mild Semantic Noise
  8. 2026What Makes VLMs Robust? Towards Reconciling Robustness and Accuracy in Vision-Language Models