How Do Video Foundation Models Encode Intuitive Physics? Probing Across Pretraining Paradigms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study whether pretrained video foundation models encode intuitive-physics information in their frozen representations, and how this information varies across model families, layers, and probe types. Using frozen-feature probing on IntPhys2 and Minimal Video Pairs (MVP), we compare predictive joint-embedding models (V-JEPA), masked reconstruction models (VideoMAE), and a diffusion-based video generator (LTX-Video). V-JEPA achieves the strongest overall results across benchmarks, especially with probes that model temporal dynamics, while VideoMAE remains competitive and LTX-Video recovers weaker but non-trivial signal. Layerwise analyses show that physics-relevant information is weakest in early layers and becomes most accessible at intermediate-to-late depth, and temporal controls show that disrupting frame order substantially reduces performance, especially on MVP. Together, these results suggest that intuitive-physics knowledge emerges reliably in pretrained video representations, but its accessibility depends strongly on pretraining paradigm, representational depth, and readout mechanism.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.
Builds on
20 of 26 references.
References · 20
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2022VideoMAE: Masked Autoencoders are Data-Efficient Learners for Self-Supervised Video Pre-Trainingcited by 1,322
- 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 1,039
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
- 2024Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Videocited by 531
- 2023VideoMAE V2: Scaling Video Masked Autoencoders with Dual Maskingcited by 528
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 383
- 2022Frozen CLIP Models are Efficient Video Learnerscited by 182
- 2024Probing the 3D Awareness of Visual Foundation Modelscited by 177
- 2023CoDeF: Content Deformation Fields for Temporally Consistent Video Processingcited by 108
8 more
- 2022Better plain ViT baselines for ImageNet-1kcited by 98
- 2021Scalable Vision Transformers with Hierarchical Poolingcited by 84
- 2025Intuitive physics understanding emerges from self-supervised pretraining on natural videoscited by 70
- 2024Video Diffusion Models are Training-free Motion Interpreter and Controllercited by 61
- 2025A Shortcut-aware Video-QA Benchmark for Physical Understanding via Minimal Video Pairscited by 30
- 2024Exploring Pre-trained Text-to-Video Diffusion Models for Referring Video Object Segmentationcited by 27
- 2025Breaking Down Video LLM Benchmarks: Knowledge, Spatial Perception, or True Temporal Understanding?cited by 20
- 2025Attention, Please! Revisiting Attentive Probing Through the Lens of Efficiencycited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Interpreting Physics in Video World Models
- 2025LikePhys: Evaluating Intuitive Physics Understanding in Video Diffusion Models via Likelihood Preference
- 2025VideoREPA: Learning Physics for Video Generation through Relational Alignment with Foundation Models
- 2025Improving the Physics of Video Generation with VJEPA-2 Reward Signal
- 2026Towards Data-Efficient Video Pre-training with Frozen Image Foundation Models
- 2026Causal Physics Steering in Video World Models via Concept Activation Vectors
- 2026Inference-time Physics Alignment of Video Generative Models with Latent World Models
- 2026Probing the Latent World: Emergent Discrete Symbols and Physical Structure in Latent Representations