mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generalizing Supervised Contrastive learning: A Projection Perspective

arXiv 2506.09810 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.IT math.ITcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-supervised contrastive learning (SSCL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for representation learning and has been studied from multiple perspectives, including mutual information and geometric viewpoints. However, supervised contrastive (SupCon) approaches have received comparatively little attention in this context: for instance, while InfoNCE used in SSCL is known to form a lower bound on mutual information (MI), the relationship between SupCon and MI remains unexplored. To address this gap, we introduce ProjNCE, a generalization of the InfoNCE loss that unifies supervised and self-supervised contrastive objectives by incorporating projection functions and an adjustment term for negative pairs. We prove that ProjNCE constitutes a valid MI bound and affords greater flexibility in selecting projection strategies for class embeddings. Building on this flexibility, we further explore the centroid-based class embeddings in SupCon by exploring a variety of projection methods. Extensive experiments on image and audio datasets demonstrate that ProjNCE consistently outperforms both SupCon and standard cross-entropy training. Our work thus refines SupCon along two complementary perspectives--information-theoretic and projection viewpoints--and offers broadly applicable improvements whenever SupCon serves as the foundational contrastive objective.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2025.

Builds on

31 of 54 references.

References · 31

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  5. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  6. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
  7. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
  8. 2023ImageBind: One Embedding Space To Bind Them Allcited by 1,162
  9. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 843
  10. 2017In Defense of the Triplet Loss for Person Re-Identificationcited by 784
  11. 2018Speech Commands: A Dataset for Limited-Vocabulary Speech Recognitioncited by 741
  12. 2019On Variational Bounds of Mutual Informationcited by 550
19 more
  1. 2020Dense Contrastive Learning for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-Trainingcited by 512
  2. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  3. 2020Debiased Contrastive Learningcited by 354
  4. 2019On Mutual Information Maximization for Representation Learningcited by 315
  5. 2022Scaling Up Dataset Distillation to ImageNet-1K with Constant Memorycited by 180
  6. 2018Noise Contrastive Estimation and Negative Sampling for Conditional Models: Consistency and Statistical Efficiencycited by 103
  7. 2021A Broad Study on the Transferability of Visual Representations with Contrastive Learningcited by 78
  8. 2021Dissecting Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 64
  9. 2022Investigating Why Contrastive Learning Benefits Robustness Against Label Noisecited by 46
  10. 2022Robust Contrastive Learning against Noisy Viewscited by 45
  11. 2022Eliciting and Learning with Soft Labels from Every Annotatorcited by 43
  12. 2022Perfectly Balanced: Improving Transfer and Robustness of Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 40
  13. 2022Unbiased Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 40
  14. 2022Online Knowledge Distillation via Mutual Contrastive Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 36
  15. 2017Estimating Mutual Information for Discrete-Continuous Mixturescited by 34
  16. 2022Is the Performance of My Deep Network Too Good to Be True? A Direct Approach to Estimating the Bayes Error in Binary Classificationcited by 24
  17. 2023Rethinking Weak Supervision in Helping Contrastive Learningcited by 18
  18. 2024Data-Driven Estimation of the False Positive Rate of the Bayes Binary Classifier via Soft Labelscited by 4
  19. 2025An Inclusive Theoretical Framework of Robust Supervised Contrastive Loss against Label Noisecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.