Data-Driven Estimation of the False Positive Rate of the Bayes Binary Classifier via Soft Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Classification is a fundamental task in many applications on which data-driven methods have shown outstanding performances. However, it is challenging to determine whether such methods have achieved the optimal performance. This is mainly because the best achievable performance is typically unknown and hence, effectively estimating it is of prime importance. In this paper, we consider binary classification problems and we propose an estimator for the false positive rate (FPR) of the Bayes classifier, that is, the optimal classifier with respect to accuracy, from a given dataset. Our method utilizes soft labels, or real-valued labels, which are gaining significant traction thanks to their properties. We thoroughly examine various theoretical properties of our estimator, including its consistency, unbiasedness, rate of convergence, and variance. To enhance the versatility of our estimator beyond soft labels, we also consider noisy labels, which encompass binary labels. For noisy labels, we develop effective FPR estimators by leveraging a denoising technique and the Nadaraya-Watson estimator. Due to the symmetry of the problem, our results can be readily applied to estimate the false negative rate of the Bayes classifier.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2024.
Builds on
18 of 42 references.
References · 18
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2019Be Your Own Teacher: Improve the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Self Distillationcited by 491
- 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
- 2022Scaling Up Dataset Distillation to ImageNet-1K with Constant Memorycited by 180
- 2021Rethinking Soft Labels for Knowledge Distillation: A Bias-Variance Tradeoff Perspectivecited by 116
- 2020Delving Deep into Label Smoothingcited by 94
- 2022Eliciting and Learning with Soft Labels from Every Annotatorcited by 43
- 2022Online Knowledge Distillation via Mutual Contrastive Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 36
- 2020Rethinking Class Relations: Absolute-relative Supervised and Unsupervised Few-shot Learningcited by 31
- 2021Knowledge Distillation as Semiparametric Inferencecited by 29
- 2022Is the Performance of My Deep Network Too Good to Be True? A Direct Approach to Estimating the Bayes Error in Binary Classificationcited by 24
6 more
- 2017Binary Classification from Positive-Confidence Datacited by 23
- 2023Binary Classification with Confidence Differencecited by 13
- 2023Learning From Biased Soft Labelscited by 8
- 2023One-to-Few Label Assignment for End-to-End Dense Detectioncited by 8
- 2022Beyond Hard Labels: Investigating data label distributionscited by 7
- 2023Training sound event detection with soft labels from crowdsourced annotationscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Probabilistic Variational Contrastive Learningcited by 2
- 2025Generalizing Supervised Contrastive learning: A Projection Perspectivecited by 1
- 2026SGD-Based Knowledge Distillation with Bayesian Teachers: Theory and Guidelinescited by 0
- 2026Bayes-Optimal BER and AUC: Estimation and Evaluation of Estimatorscited by 0
- 2026Bayes-Optimal BER and AUC: Estimation and Evaluation of Estimators2 Sep 2026
- 2026SGD-Based Knowledge Distillation with Bayesian Teachers: Theory and Guidelines4 Jan 2026
- 2025Probabilistic Variational Contrastive Learning11 Jun 2025
- 2025Generalizing Supervised Contrastive learning: A Projection Perspective11 Jun 2025