mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Properties of Feature Attribution for Supervised Contrastive Learning

arXiv 2604.22540 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most Neural Networks (NNs) for classification are trained using Cross-Entropy as a loss function. This approach requires the model to have an explicit classification layer. However, there exist alternative approaches, such as Contrastive Learning (CL). Instead of explicitly operating a classification, CL has the NN produce an embedding space where projections of similar data are pulled together, while projections of dissimilar data are pushed apart. In the case of Supervised CL (SCL), labels are adopted as similarity criteria, thus creating an embedding space where the projected data points are well-clustered. SCL provides crucial advantages over CE with regard to adversarial robustness and out-of-distribution detection, thus making it a more natural choice in safety-critical scenarios. In the present paper, we empirically show that NNs for image classification trained with SCL present higher-quality feature attribution explanations than CL with regard to faithfulness, complexity, and continuity. These results reinforce previous findings about CL-based approaches when targeting more trustworthy and transparent NNs and can guide practitioners in the selection of training objectives targeting not only accuracy, but also transparency of the models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.

Builds on

39 of 62 references.

References · 39

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  8. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  9. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  10. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  11. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  12. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
27 more
  1. 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,081
  2. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  3. 2017In Defense of the Triplet Loss for Person Re-Identificationcited by 784
  4. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
  5. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
  6. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  7. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
  8. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
  9. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  10. 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 374
  11. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
  12. 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 299
  13. 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
  14. 2020Eigen-CAM: Class Activation Map using Principal Componentscited by 188
  15. 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 185
  16. 2022Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyondcited by 171
  17. 2020Intriguing Properties of Contrastive Lossescited by 129
  18. 2023Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A Manifesto of Open Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research Directionscited by 123
  19. 2021When Does Contrastive Learning Preserve Adversarial Robustness from Pretraining to Finetuning?cited by 76
  20. 2019Towards Best Practice in Explaining Neural Network Decisions with LRPcited by 70
  21. 2021Contrastive Out-of-Distribution Detection for Pretrained Transformerscited by 70
  22. 2021Dissecting Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 64
  23. 2022A Survey of Robust Adversarial Training in Pattern Recognition: Fundamental, Theory, and Methodologiescited by 44
  24. 2024F-Fidelity: A Robust Framework for Faithfulness Evaluation of Explainable AIcited by 17
  25. 2025Variational Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 5
  26. 2021ExCon: Explanation-driven Supervised Contrastive Learning for Image Classificationcited by 2
  27. 2025Generalizing Supervised Contrastive learning: A Projection Perspectivecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.