Local MDI+: Local Feature Importances for Tree-Based Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Tree-based ensembles such as random forests remain the go-to for tabular data over deep learning models due to their prediction performance and computational efficiency. These advantages have led to their widespread deployment in high-stakes domains, where interpretability is essential for ensuring trustworthy predictions. This has motivated the development of popular local feature importance methods such as LIME and TreeSHAP. However, these approaches rely on approximations that ignore the model's internal structure and instead depend on potentially unstable perturbations. These issues are addressed in the global setting by MDI+, a global feature importance method which combines tree-based and linear feature importances by exploiting an equivalence between decision trees and least squares on a transformed node basis. However, the global MDI+ scores are not able to explain predictions when faced with heterogeneous individual characteristics. To address this gap, we propose Local MDI+ (LMDI+), a novel extension of the MDI+ framework that quantifies feature importances for each particular sample. Across twelve real-world benchmark datasets, LMDI+ outperforms existing baselines at identifying instance-specific predictive features, yielding an average 10% improvement in predictive performance when using only the selected features. It further demonstrates greater stability by consistently producing similar instance-level feature importance rankings across repeated model fits with different random seeds. Ablation experiments show that each component of LMDI+ contributes to these gains, and that the improvements extend beyond random forests to gradient boosting models. Finally, we show that LMDI+ enables local interpretability use cases by identifying closely matched counterfactuals for each classification benchmark and discovering homogeneous subgroups in a housing dataset case study.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2025.
Builds on
29 of 70 references.
References · 29
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
- 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 526
- 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
- 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 312
- 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 305
- 2022Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?cited by 199
- 2017OpenML Benchmarking Suitescited by 178
- 2020Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanationscited by 157
17 more
- 2019Unrestricted Permutation forces Extrapolation: Variable Importance Requires at least One More Model, or There Is No Free Variable Importancecited by 87
- 2018Model Agnostic Supervised Local Explanationscited by 83
- 2022Impossibility Theorems for Feature Attributioncited by 78
- 2019Veridical Data Sciencecited by 66
- 2021NICE: An Algorithm for Nearest Instance Counterfactual Explanationscited by 62
- 2019DLIME: A Deterministic Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations Approach for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systemscited by 59
- 2017Iterative Random Forests to detect predictive and stable high-order interactionscited by 42
- 2021Large Scale Prediction with Decision Treescited by 28
- 2022Fast Interpretable Greedy-Tree Sumscited by 13
- 2023Are Your Explanations Reliable? Investigating the Stability of LIME in Explaining Text Classifiers by Marrying XAI and Adversarial Attackcited by 10
- 2024Normalized AOPC: Fixing Misleading Faithfulness Metrics for Feature Attribution Explainabilitycited by 10
- 2021A cautionary tale on fitting decision trees to data from additive models: generalization lower boundscited by 9
- 2021Interpretable Artificial Intelligence through the Lens of Feature Interactioncited by 5
- 2021From global to local MDI variable importances for random forests and when they are Shapley valuescited by 4
- 2021Behavior of k-NN as an Instance-Based Explanation Methodcited by 2
- 2024Selective Explanationscited by 2
- 2021A Survey Of Regression Algorithms And Connections With Deep Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2026OC-Distill: Ontology-aware Contrastive Learning with Cross-Modal Distillation for ICU Risk Predictioncited by 2
- 2026Evidence-Unit Fairness and the Limits of Query-Adaptive Sparse-Dense Fusion in Financial Document Retrievalcited by 1
- 2025Provable Recovery of Locally Important Signed Features and Interactions from Random Forestcited by 0
- 2026Evidence-Unit Fairness and the Limits of Query-Adaptive Sparse-Dense Fusion in Financial Document Retrieval31 Jul 2026
- 2026OC-Distill: Ontology-aware Contrastive Learning with Cross-Modal Distillation for ICU Risk Prediction18 Apr 2026
- 2025Provable Recovery of Locally Important Signed Features and Interactions from Random Forest11 Dec 2025