mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interpretable Artificial Intelligence through the Lens of Feature Interaction

arXiv 2103.03103 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2021cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Interpretation of deep learning models is a very challenging problem because of their large number of parameters, complex connections between nodes, and unintelligible feature representations. Despite this, many view interpretability as a key solution to trustworthiness, fairness, and safety, especially as deep learning is applied to more critical decision tasks like credit approval, job screening, and recidivism prediction. There is an abundance of good research providing interpretability to deep learning models; however, many of the commonly used methods do not consider a phenomenon called "feature interaction." This work first explains the historical and modern importance of feature interactions and then surveys the modern interpretability methods which do explicitly consider feature interactions. This survey aims to bring to light the importance of feature interactions in the larger context of machine learning interpretability, especially in a modern context where deep learning models heavily rely on feature interactions.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2021.

Builds on

21 of 60 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  5. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  6. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  7. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  8. 2016Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systemscited by 745
  9. 2017DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Predictioncited by 673
  10. 2017Deep & Cross Network for Ad Click Predictionscited by 392
  11. 2018AutoInt: Automatic Feature Interaction Learning via Self-Attentive Neural Networkscited by 319
  12. 2018xDeepFM: Combining Explicit and Implicit Feature Interactions for Recommender Systemscited by 277
9 more
  1. 2020Explaining Explanations: Axiomatic Feature Interactions for Deep Networkscited by 103
  2. 2017Detecting Statistical Interactions from Neural Network Weightscited by 80
  3. 2020How does this interaction affect me? Interpretable attribution for feature interactionscited by 73
  4. 2018Beyond Word Importance: Contextual Decomposition to Extract Interactions from LSTMscited by 67
  5. 2018Hierarchical interpretations for neural network predictionscited by 66
  6. 2020Feature Interaction Interpretability: A Case for Explaining Ad-Recommendation Systems via Neural Interaction Detectioncited by 32
  7. 2019Towards Hierarchical Importance Attribution: Explaining Compositional Semantics for Neural Sequence Modelscited by 26
  8. 2019Understanding Impacts of High-Order Loss Approximations and Features in Deep Learning Interpretationcited by 22
  9. 2018Can I trust you more? Model-Agnostic Hierarchical Explanationscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

5 papers.