mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Intention-Conditioned Flow Occupancy Models

arXiv 2506.08902 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale pre-training has fundamentally changed how machine learning research is done today: large foundation models are trained once, and then can be used by anyone in the community (including those without data or compute resources to train a model from scratch) to adapt and fine-tune to specific tasks. Applying this same framework to reinforcement learning (RL) is appealing because it offers compelling avenues for addressing core challenges in RL, including sample efficiency and robustness. However, there remains a fundamental challenge to pre-train large models in the context of RL: actions have long-term dependencies, so training a foundation model that reasons across time is important. Recent advances in generative AI have provided new tools for modeling highly complex distributions. In this paper, we build a probabilistic model to predict which states an agent will visit in the temporally distant future (i.e., an occupancy measure) using flow matching. As large datasets are often constructed by many distinct users performing distinct tasks, we include in our model a latent variable capturing the user intention. This intention increases the expressivity of our model, and enables adaptation with generalized policy improvement. We call our proposed method intention-conditioned flow occupancy models (InFOM). Comparing with alternative methods for pre-training, our experiments on 36 state-based and 4 image-based benchmark tasks demonstrate that the proposed method achieves 1.8 × median improvement in returns and increases success rates by 36%. Website: https://chongyi-zheng.github.io/infom Code: https://github.com/chongyi-zheng/infom

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 125 of its 153 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2025.

Builds on

125 of 153 references.

References · 125

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  4. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  5. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  6. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  7. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  8. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  9. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  10. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  11. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  12. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
38 more
  1. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  2. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  3. 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,058
  4. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  5. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  6. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  7. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  8. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,712
  9. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  10. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
  11. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  12. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
  13. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
  14. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
  15. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,407
  16. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,222
  17. 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,079
  18. 2022RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scalecited by 2,061
  19. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,809
  20. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
  21. 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,546
  22. 2024Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policycited by 1,484
  23. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,293
  24. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  25. 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,253
  26. 2022Planning with Diffusion for Flexible Behavior Synthesiscited by 1,061
  27. 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 995
  28. 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 993
  29. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 956
  30. 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 930
  31. 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 899
  32. 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 883
  33. 2023Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Modelscited by 862
  34. 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 773
  35. 2020CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 760
  36. 2018Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Functioncited by 752
  37. 2022R3M: A Universal Visual Representation for Robot Manipulationcited by 694
  38. 2023BridgeData V2: A Dataset for Robot Learning at Scalecited by 657

50 most cited of 125 All 125 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 7.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Survey of Flow Matching in Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2025Flow-Based Single-Step Completion for Efficient and Expressive Policy Learning
  3. 2026Flow Matching for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Discrete Actions
  4. 2025Imagine Beyond! Distributionally Robust Auto-Encoding for State Space Coverage in Online Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2022Let Offline RL Flow: Training Conservative Agents in the Latent Space of Normalizing Flows
  6. 2019Learning Dynamics Model in Reinforcement Learning by Incorporating the Long Term Future
  7. 2025Learning from Reward-Free Offline Data: A Case for Planning with Latent Dynamics Models
  8. 2026Understanding Goal Generalisation in Sequential Reinforcement Learning