mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

iREPO: implicit Reward Pairwise Difference based Empirical Preference Optimization

arXiv 2405.15230 ↗First posted 24 May 2024cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

While astonishingly capable, large Language Models (LLM) can sometimes produce outputs that deviate from human expectations. Such deviations necessitate an alignment phase to prevent disseminating untruthful, toxic, or biased information. Traditional alignment methods based on reinforcement learning often struggle with the identified instability, whereas preference optimization methods are limited by their overfitting to pre-collected hard-label datasets. In this paper, we propose a novel LLM alignment framework named iREPO, which utilizes implicit Reward pairwise difference regression for Empirical Preference Optimization. Particularly, iREPO employs self-generated datasets labeled by empirical human (or AI annotator) preference to iteratively refine the aligned policy through a novel regression-based loss function. Furthermore, we introduce an innovative algorithm backed by theoretical guarantees for achieving optimal results under ideal assumptions and providing a practical performance-gap result without such assumptions. Experimental results with Phi-2 and Mistral-7B demonstrate that iREPO effectively achieves self-alignment using soft-label, self-generated responses and the logit of empirical AI annotators. Furthermore, our approach surpasses preference optimization baselines in evaluations using the Language Model Evaluation Harness and Multi-turn benchmarks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 28 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2024.

Builds on

28 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedback1 Mar
  2. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  3. 2023Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraints28 Sep
  4. 2023Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization13 Sep
  5. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 23

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  7. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  8. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  9. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  10. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  11. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
  12. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
11 more
  1. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  2. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  3. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  4. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  5. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 738
  6. 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedbackcited by 395
  7. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraintcited by 346
  8. 2024Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignmentcited by 228
  9. 2024Direct Nash Optimization: Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve with General Preferencescited by 176
  10. 2024Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference Modelcited by 52
  11. 2022Efficient computation of rankings from pairwise comparisonscited by 31

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025RE-PO: Robust Enhanced Policy Optimization as a General Framework for LLM Alignment
  2. 2026From RLHF to Direct Alignment: A Theoretical Unification of Preference Learning for Large Language Models
  3. 2024Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs
  4. 2024Multi-Preference Optimization: Generalizing DPO via Set-Level Contrasts
  5. 2024Self-Augmented Preference Optimization: Off-Policy Paradigms for Language Model Alignment
  6. 2025Towards Reliable, Uncertainty-Aware Alignment
  7. 2024Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model Alignment
  8. 2025IPO: Your Language Model is Secretly a Preference Classifier