Intent Matters: Enhancing AI Tutoring with Fine-Grained Pedagogical Intent Annotation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) hold great promise for educational applications, particularly in intelligent tutoring systems. However, effective tutoring requires alignment with pedagogical strategies - something current LLMs lack without task-specific adaptation. In this work, we explore whether fine-grained annotation of teacher intents can improve the quality of LLM-generated tutoring responses. We focus on MathDial, a dialog dataset for math instruction, and apply an automated annotation framework to re-annotate a portion of the dataset using a detailed taxonomy of eleven pedagogical intents. We then fine-tune an LLM using these new annotations and compare its performance to models trained on the original four-category taxonomy. Both automatic and qualitative evaluations show that the fine-grained model produces more pedagogically aligned and effective responses. Our findings highlight the value of intent specificity for controlled text generation in educational settings, and we release our annotated data and code to facilitate further research.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2025.
Builds on
14 of 29 references.
References · 14
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
- 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 411
- 2024Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlookcited by 188
- 2023MathDial: A Dialogue Tutoring Dataset with Rich Pedagogical Properties Grounded in Math Reasoning Problemscited by 131
- 2023A Systematic Study and Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Benchmark Datasetscited by 123
- 2023Controlled Text Generation with Natural Language Instructionscited by 87
- 2023Large Language Models in Education: Vision and Opportunitiescited by 54
- 2023Bridging the Novice-Expert Gap via Models of Decision-Making: A Case Study on Remediating Math Mistakescited by 52
- 2024AutoTutor meets Large Language Models: A Language Model Tutor with Rich Pedagogy and Guardrailscited by 31
- 2024FullAnno: A Data Engine for Enhancing Image Comprehension of MLLMscited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 7.
8 papers.
- 2025Opportunities and Challenges of LLMs in Education: An NLP Perspectivecited by 6
- 2026IntentGrasp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Intent Understandingcited by 1
- 2026Codebook-Injected Dialogue Segmentation for Multi-Utterance Constructs Annotation: LLM-Assisted and Gold-Label-Free Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Incentives Of EdTech: A Systematic Review Of EduNLP Researchcited by 0
- 2026Examining Variation in How Guided AI Tutors Resolve Student Impassescited by 0
- 2026DICE: Decoupling Capability from Intervention Necessity in LLM Tutoringcited by 0
- 2026Do LLM Tutors Actually Teach? A Process-Centered Synthesis of the Tutoring Loopcited by 0
- 2026A Unified Response Framework for Questions and Tutoring Dialoguescited by 0
- 2026A Unified Response Framework for Questions and Tutoring Dialogues14 Oct 2026
- 2026Do LLM Tutors Actually Teach? A Process-Centered Synthesis of the Tutoring Loop11 Oct 2026
- 2026DICE: Decoupling Capability from Intervention Necessity in LLM Tutoring4 Oct 2026
- 2026Examining Variation in How Guided AI Tutors Resolve Student Impasses29 Sep 2026
- 2026Incentives Of EdTech: A Systematic Review Of EduNLP Research13 May 2026
- 2026IntentGrasp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Intent Understanding7 May 2026
- 2026Codebook-Injected Dialogue Segmentation for Multi-Utterance Constructs Annotation: LLM-Assisted and Gold-Label-Free Evaluation17 Jan 2026
- 2025Opportunities and Challenges of LLMs in Education: An NLP Perspective30 Jul 2025