mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

IntentGrasp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Intent Understanding

arXiv 2605.06832 ↗First posted 7 May 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurately understanding the intent behind speech, conversation, and writing is crucial to the development of helpful Large Language Model (LLM) assistants. This paper introduces IntentGrasp, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the intent understanding capability of LLMs. Derived from 49 high-quality, open-licensed corpora spanning 12 diverse domains, IntentGrasp is constructed through source datasets curation, intent label contextualization, and task format unification. IntentGrasp contains a large-scale training set of 262,759 instances and two evaluation sets: an All Set of 12,909 test cases and a more balanced and challenging Gem Set of 470 cases. Extensive evaluations on 20 LLMs across 7 families (including frontier models such as GPT-5.4, Gemini-3.1-Pro, and Claude-Opus-4.7) demonstrate unsatisfactory performance, with scores below 60% on All Set and below 25% on Gem set. Notably, 17 out of 20 tested models perform worse than a random-guess baseline (15.2%) on Gem Set, while the estimated human performance is ~81.1%, showing substantial room for improvement. To enhance such ability, this paper proposes Intentional Fine-Tuning (IFT), which fine-tunes the models on the training set in IntentGrasp, yielding significant gains of 30+ F1 points on All Set and 20+ points on Gem Set. Tellingly, the leave-one-domain-out (Lodo) experiments further demonstrate the strong cross-domain generalizability of IFT, verifying that it is a promising approach to substantially enhancing the intent understanding of LLMs. Overall, by benchmarking and boosting intent understanding ability, this study sheds light on a promising path towards more intentional, capable, and safe AI assistants for human benefits and social good.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 75 of its 112 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

Builds on

75 of 112 references.

References · 75

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  5. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  7. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  8. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  9. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  10. 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 989
  11. 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 916
  12. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
38 more
  1. 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 763
  2. 2024MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategiescited by 723
  3. 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 525
  4. 2021Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 463
  5. 2019Towards Scalable Multi-domain Conversational Agents: The Schema-Guided Dialogue Datasetcited by 434
  6. 2020Efficient Intent Detection with Dual Sentence Encoderscited by 433
  7. 2019An Evaluation Dataset for Intent Classification and Out-of-Scope Predictioncited by 386
  8. 2018Snips Voice Platform: an embedded Spoken Language Understanding system for private-by-design voice interfacescited by 377
  9. 2023Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 263
  10. 2024LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmarkcited by 262
  11. 2023Using an LLM to Help With Code Understandingcited by 228
  12. 2020MultiWOZ 2.2 : A Dialogue Dataset with Additional Annotation Corrections and State Tracking Baselinescited by 204
  13. 2020SLURP: A Spoken Language Understanding Resource Packagecited by 198
  14. 2024Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?cited by 195
  15. 2023Time Travel in LLMs: Tracing Data Contamination in Large Language Modelscited by 177
  16. 2019Benchmarking Natural Language Understanding Services for building Conversational Agentscited by 166
  17. 2026Towards End-to-End Automation of AI Researchcited by 159
  18. 2020MTOP: A Comprehensive Multilingual Task-Oriented Semantic Parsing Benchmarkcited by 158
  19. 2023Investigating Data Contamination in Modern Benchmarks for Large Language Modelscited by 138
  20. 2020Moral Stories: Situated Reasoning about Norms, Intents, Actions, and their Consequencescited by 135
  21. 2019Structural Scaffolds for Citation Intent Classification in Scientific Publicationscited by 130
  22. 2018Cross-Lingual Transfer Learning for Multilingual Task Oriented Dialogcited by 125
  23. 2018Semantic Parsing for Task Oriented Dialog using Hierarchical Representationscited by 101
  24. 2025AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific Innovationcited by 100
  25. 2024Tell Me More! Towards Implicit User Intention Understanding of Language Model Driven Agentscited by 74
  26. 2022Understanding Iterative Revision from Human-Written Textcited by 57
  27. 2020MultiWOZ 2.3: A multi-domain task-oriented dialogue dataset enhanced with annotation corrections and co-reference annotationcited by 51
  28. 2020Recent Neural Methods on Slot Filling and Intent Classification for Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems: A Surveycited by 51
  29. 2020A Taxonomy of Empathetic Response Intents in Human Social Conversationscited by 51
  30. 2021From Masked Language Modeling to Translation: Non-English Auxiliary Tasks Improve Zero-shot Spoken Language Understandingcited by 43
  31. 2021Multilingual and Cross-Lingual Intent Detection from Spoken Datacited by 35
  32. 2019Introducing MANtIS: a novel Multi-Domain Information Seeking Dialogues Datasetcited by 26
  33. 2022arXivEdits: Understanding the Human Revision Process in Scientific Writingcited by 26
  34. 2024Does Data Contamination Detection Work (Well) for LLMs? A Survey and Evaluation on Detection Assumptionscited by 26
  35. 2025Customizing Emotional Support: How Do Individuals Construct and Interact With LLM-Powered Chatbotscited by 25
  36. 2020Intentonomy: a Dataset and Study towards Human Intent Understandingcited by 22
  37. 2020HINT3: Raising the bar for Intent Detection in the Wildcited by 21
  38. 2019Dialog Intent Induction with Deep Multi-View Clusteringcited by 20

50 most cited of 75 All 75 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.