mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AUTOCT: Automating Interpretable Clinical Trial Prediction with LLM Agents

arXiv 2506.04293 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clinical trials are critical for advancing medical treatments but remain prohibitively expensive and time-consuming. Accurate prediction of clinical trial outcomes can significantly reduce research and development costs and accelerate drug discovery. While recent deep learning models have shown promise by leveraging unstructured data, their black-box nature, lack of interpretability, and vulnerability to label leakage limit their practical use in high-stakes biomedical contexts. In this work, we propose AutoCT, a novel framework that combines the reasoning capabilities of large language models with the explainability of classical machine learning. AutoCT autonomously generates, evaluates, and refines tabular features based on public information without human input. Our method uses Monte Carlo Tree Search to iteratively optimize predictive performance. Experimental results show that AutoCT performs on par with or better than SOTA methods on clinical trial prediction tasks within only a limited number of self-refinement iterations, establishing a new paradigm for scalable, interpretable, and cost-efficient clinical trial prediction.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.

Builds on

16 of 34 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
  5. 2024Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A surveycited by 414
  6. 2023Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Surveycited by 183
  7. 2025A Survey of LLM-based Agents in Medicine: How far are we from Baymax?cited by 84
  8. 2024Large Language Models Can Automatically Engineer Features for Few-Shot Tabular Learningcited by 79
  9. 2021HINT: Hierarchical Interaction Network for Trial Outcome Prediction Leveraging Web Datacited by 49
  10. 2020COMPOSE: Cross-Modal Pseudo-Siamese Network for Patient Trial Matchingcited by 37
  11. 2024ClinicalAgent: Clinical Trial Multi-Agent System with Large Language Model-based Reasoningcited by 31
  12. 2024Exploring Large Language Models for Feature Selection: A Data-centric Perspectivecited by 27
4 more
  1. 2023Deceptive Semantic Shortcuts on Reasoning Chains: How Far Can Models Go without Hallucination?cited by 26
  2. 2024Conceptual and Unbiased Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 19
  3. 2023SPOT: Sequential Predictive Modeling of Clinical Trial Outcome with Meta-Learningcited by 13
  4. 2024Adaptive Reasoning and Acting in Medical Language Agentscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 8.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023AutoTrial: Prompting Language Models for Clinical Trial Design
  2. 2025TrialMatchAI: An End-to-End AI-powered Clinical Trial Recommendation System to Streamline Patient-to-Trial Matching
  3. 2026DoctorAgents: an agentic framework to iteratively refine AutoML pipeline for small clinical temporal data
  4. 2025MMCTOP: A Multimodal Textualization and Mixture-of-Experts Framework for Clinical Trial Outcome Prediction
  5. 2024Retrieval-Reasoning Large Language Model-based Synthetic Clinical Trial Generation
  6. 2026Automatic Construction of Clinical Scoring Systems with LLM Agents
  7. 2025ROBoto2: An Interactive System and Dataset for LLM-assisted Clinical Trial Risk of Bias Assessment
  8. 2026DeepImagine: Clinical Trial Outcome Prediction via Stepwise Local Counterfactual Imaginations