ROBoto2: An Interactive System and Dataset for LLM-assisted Clinical Trial Risk of Bias Assessment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present ROBOTO2, an open-source, web-based platform for large language model (LLM)-assisted risk of bias (ROB) assessment of clinical trials. ROBOTO2 streamlines the traditionally labor-intensive ROB v2 (ROB2) annotation process via an interactive interface that combines PDF parsing, retrieval-augmented LLM prompting, and human-in-the-loop review. Users can upload clinical trial reports, receive preliminary answers and supporting evidence for ROB2 signaling questions, and provide real-time feedback or corrections to system suggestions. ROBOTO2 is publicly available at https://roboto2.vercel.app/, with code and data released to foster reproducibility and adoption. We construct and release a dataset of 521 pediatric clinical trial reports (8954 signaling questions with 1202 evidence passages), annotated using both manually and LLM-assisted methods, serving as a benchmark and enabling future research. Using this dataset, we benchmark ROB2 performance for 4 LLMs and provide an analysis into current model capabilities and ongoing challenges in automating this critical aspect of systematic review.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2025.
Builds on
11 of 36 references.
References · 11
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2021MS2: Multi-Document Summarization of Medical Studiescited by 80
- 2018A Corpus with Multi-Level Annotations of Patients, Interventions and Outcomes to Support Language Processing for Medical Literaturecited by 79
- 2019Inferring Which Medical Treatments Work from Reports of Clinical Trialscited by 63
- 2020Generating (Factual?) Narrative Summaries of RCTs: Experiments with Neural Multi-Document Summarizationcited by 52
- 2023Summarizing, Simplifying, and Synthesizing Medical Evidence Using GPT-3 (with Varying Success)cited by 40
- 2020Evidence Inference 2.0: More Data, Better Modelscited by 39
- 2024The LLM Effect: Are Humans Truly Using LLMs, or Are They Being Influenced By Them Instead?cited by 14
- 2023CARE: Extracting Experimental Findings From Clinical Literaturecited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Sharding Prevents LLM Oversight Failures and Adversarial Exploitationcited by 0
- 2026Can LLMs Follow Medical Expert Logic? A Benchmark for Hierarchical Logical Consistency in Risk-of-Bias Assessmentcited by 0
- 2026EviStreams: Human-in-the-Loop AI Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews in Medicinecited by 0
- 2026EviStreams: Human-in-the-Loop AI Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews in Medicine23 Sep 2026
- 2026Can LLMs Follow Medical Expert Logic? A Benchmark for Hierarchical Logical Consistency in Risk-of-Bias Assessment10 Sep 2026
- 2026Sharding Prevents LLM Oversight Failures and Adversarial Exploitation5 Aug 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Automated Risk-of-Bias Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials: A First Look at a GEPA-trained Programmatic Prompting Framework
- 2025RiskAgent: Synergizing Language Models with Validated Tools for Evidence-Based Risk Prediction
- 2026Can LLM Agents Generate Real-World Evidence? Evaluating Observational Studies in Medical Databases
- 2024Bias patterns in the application of LLMs for clinical decision support: A comprehensive study
- 2024SemEval-2024 Task 2: Safe Biomedical Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trials
- 2025Toward Revealing Nuanced Biases in Medical LLMs
- 2026Safety and accuracy follow different scaling laws in clinical large language models
- 2026First, Do No Harm (With LLMs): Mitigating Racial Bias via Agentic Workflows