mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AutoTrial: Prompting Language Models for Clinical Trial Design

arXiv 2305.11366 ↗First posted 19 May 2023cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clinical trials are critical for drug development. Constructing the appropriate eligibility criteria (i.e., the inclusion/exclusion criteria for patient recruitment) is essential for the trial's success. Proper design of clinical trial protocols should consider similar precedent trials and their eligibility criteria to ensure sufficient patient coverage. In this paper, we present a method named AutoTrial to aid the design of clinical eligibility criteria using language models. It allows (1) controllable generation under instructions via a hybrid of discrete and neural prompting, (2) scalable knowledge incorporation via in-context learning, and (3) explicit reasoning chains to provide rationales for understanding the outputs. Experiments on over 70K clinical trials verify that AutoTrial generates high-quality criteria texts that are fluent and coherent and with high accuracy in capturing the relevant clinical concepts to the target trial. It is noteworthy that our method, with a much smaller parameter size, gains around 60% winning rate against the GPT-3.5 baselines via human evaluations.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2023.

Builds on

19 of 31 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  5. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  6. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  7. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  8. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  9. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  10. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  11. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  12. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
7 more
  1. 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
  2. 2022Galactica: A Large Language Model for Sciencecited by 736
  3. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 672
  4. 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 454
  5. 2022A Contrastive Framework for Neural Text Generationcited by 224
  6. 2022Deep Bidirectional Language-Knowledge Graph Pretrainingcited by 156
  7. 2022Trial2Vec: Zero-Shot Clinical Trial Document Similarity Search using Self-Supervisioncited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Improving Patient Pre-screening for Clinical Trials: Assisting Physicians with Large Language Models
  2. 2025AUTOCT: Automating Interpretable Clinical Trial Prediction with LLM Agents
  3. 2024ClinicalAgent: Clinical Trial Multi-Agent System with Large Language Model-based Reasoning
  4. 2025AutoMedPrompt: A New Framework for Optimizing LLM Medical Prompts Using Textual Gradients
  5. 2023An Empirical Evaluation of Prompting Strategies for Large Language Models in Zero-Shot Clinical Natural Language Processing
  6. 2025A Survey on LLM-Assisted Clinical Trial Recruitment
  7. 2024Retrieval-Reasoning Large Language Model-based Synthetic Clinical Trial Generation
  8. 2023CohortGPT: An Enhanced GPT for Participant Recruitment in Clinical Study