mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comprehensive Attribute Encoding and Dynamic LSTM HyperModels for Outcome Oriented Predictive Business Process Monitoring

arXiv 2506.03696 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2025cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Predictive Business Process Monitoring (PBPM) aims to forecast future outcomes of ongoing business processes. However, existing methods often lack flexibility to handle real-world challenges such as simultaneous events, class imbalance, and multi-level attributes. While prior work has explored static encoding schemes and fixed LSTM architectures, they struggle to support adaptive representations and generalize across heterogeneous datasets. To address these limitations, we propose a suite of dynamic LSTM HyperModels that integrate two-level hierarchical encoding for event and sequence attributes, character-based decomposition of event labels, and novel pseudo-embedding techniques for durations and attribute correlations. We further introduce specialized LSTM variants for simultaneous event modeling, leveraging multidimensional embeddings and time-difference flag augmentation. Experimental validation on four public and real-world datasets demonstrates up to 100% accuracy on balanced datasets and F1 scores exceeding 86% on imbalanced ones. Our approach advances PBPM by offering modular and interpretable models better suited for deployment in complex settings. Beyond PBPM, it contributes to the broader AI community by improving temporal outcome prediction, supporting data heterogeneity, and promoting explainable process intelligence frameworks.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.

Builds on

26 of 61 references.

References · 26

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  4. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  5. 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 345
  6. 2016On the Expressive Power of Deep Neural Networkscited by 306
  7. 2015A Theoretically Grounded Application of Dropout in Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 161
  8. 2016Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networkscited by 104
  9. 2013Deep Learning of Representations: Looking Forwardcited by 84
  10. 2016Predicting Process Behaviour using Deep Learningcited by 60
  11. 2020Deep Learning for Predictive Business Process Monitoring: Review and Benchmarkcited by 45
  12. 2018Survey and cross-benchmark comparison of remaining time prediction methods in business process monitoringcited by 43
14 more
  1. 2013Predictive Monitoring of Business Processescited by 37
  2. 2021A systematic literature review on state-of-the-art deep learning methods for process predictioncited by 32
  3. 2015Clustering-Based Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 24
  4. 2021A comparison of LSTM and GRU networks for learning symbolic sequencescited by 24
  5. 2017LSTM Networks for Data-Aware Remaining Time Prediction of Business Process Instancescited by 19
  6. 2020Time Matters: Time-Aware LSTMs for Predictive Business Process Monitoringcited by 14
  7. 2021Process Outcome Prediction: CNN vs. LSTM (with Attention)cited by 12
  8. 2021Text-Aware Predictive Monitoring of Business Processescited by 9
  9. 2022Outcome-Oriented Prescriptive Process Monitoring Based on Temporal Logic Patternscited by 7
  10. 2018Classifying Process Instances Using Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 6
  11. 2023Trace Encoding in Process Mining: a survey and benchmarkingcited by 6
  12. 2023Tailoring Machine Learning for Process Miningcited by 4
  13. 2018Specification-Driven Multi-Perspective Predictive Business Process Monitoring (Extended Version)cited by 1
  14. 2021LSTM Hyper-Parameter Selection for Malware Detection: Interaction Effects and Hierarchical Selection Approachcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

5 papers.