mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Time-Aware and Transition-Semantic Graph Neural Networks for Interpretable Predictive Business Process Monitoring

arXiv 2508.09527 ↗First posted 13 Aug 2025cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Predictive Business Process Monitoring (PBPM) aims to forecast future events in ongoing cases based on historical event logs. While Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are well suited to capture structural dependencies in process data, existing GNN-based PBPM models remain underdeveloped. Most rely either on short prefix subgraphs or global architectures that overlook temporal relevance and transition semantics. We propose a unified, interpretable GNN framework that advances the state of the art along three key axes. First, we compare prefix-based Graph Convolutional Networks(GCNs) and full trace Graph Attention Networks(GATs) to quantify the performance gap between localized and global modeling. Second, we introduce a novel time decay attention mechanism that constructs dynamic, prediction-centered windows, emphasizing temporally relevant history and suppressing noise. Third, we embed transition type semantics into edge features to enable fine grained reasoning over structurally ambiguous traces. Our architecture includes multilevel interpretability modules, offering diverse visualizations of attention behavior. Evaluated on five benchmarks, the proposed models achieve competitive Top-k accuracy and DL scores without per-dataset tuning. By addressing architectural, temporal, and semantic gaps, this work presents a robust, generalizable, and explainable solution for next event prediction in PBPM.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2025.

Builds on

18 of 56 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
  4. 2016Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networkscited by 104
  5. 2016Predicting Process Behaviour using Deep Learningcited by 60
  6. 2020Deep Learning for Predictive Business Process Monitoring: Review and Benchmarkcited by 45
  7. 2018Survey and cross-benchmark comparison of remaining time prediction methods in business process monitoringcited by 43
  8. 2021ProcessTransformer: Predictive Business Process Monitoring with Transformer Networkcited by 37
  9. 2020Predictive Business Process Monitoring via Generative Adversarial Nets: The Case of Next Event Predictioncited by 31
  10. 2015Clustering-Based Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 24
  11. 2020Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Process Mining: A General Overview and Application of a Novel Local Explanation Approach for Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 20
  12. 2020Time Matters: Time-Aware LSTMs for Predictive Business Process Monitoringcited by 14
6 more
  1. 2024PGTNet: A Process Graph Transformer Network for Remaining Time Prediction of Business Process Instancescited by 14
  2. 2021Embedding Graph Convolutional Networks in Recurrent Neural Networks for Predictive Monitoringcited by 12
  3. 2017Temporal Stability in Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 8
  4. 2025Comprehensive Attribute Encoding and Dynamic LSTM HyperModels for Outcome Oriented Predictive Business Process Monitoringcited by 5
  5. 2024Generating Feasible and Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Outcome Prediction of Business Processescited by 4
  6. 2025HGCN(O): A Self-Tuning GCN HyperModel Toolkit for Outcome Prediction in Event-Sequence Datacited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.