mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Trace Encoding in Process Mining: a survey and benchmarking

arXiv 2301.02167 ↗First posted 5 Jan 2023cs.LG cs.DBcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Encoding methods are employed across several process mining tasks, including predictive process monitoring, anomalous case detection, trace clustering, etc. These methods are usually performed as preprocessing steps and are responsible for transforming complex information into a numerical feature space. Most papers choose existing encoding methods arbitrarily or employ a strategy based on a specific expert knowledge domain. Moreover, existing methods are employed by using their default hyperparameters without evaluating other options. This practice can lead to several drawbacks, such as suboptimal performance and unfair comparisons with the state-of-the-art. Therefore, this work aims at providing a comprehensive survey on event log encoding by comparing 27 methods, from different natures, in terms of expressivity, scalability, correlation, and domain agnosticism. To the best of our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive study so far focusing on trace encoding in process mining. It contributes to maturing awareness about the role of trace encoding in process mining pipelines and sheds light on issues, concerns, and future research directions regarding the use of encoding methods to bridge the gap between machine learning models and process mining.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2023.

Builds on

26 of 72 references.

References · 26

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  2. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  3. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
  4. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
  5. 2022data2vec: A General Framework for Self-supervised Learning in Speech, Vision and Languagecited by 718
  6. 2014Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documentscited by 677
  7. 2017Network Embedding as Matrix Factorization: Unifying DeepWalk, LINE, PTE, and node2veccited by 197
  8. 2017Graph Embedding Techniques, Applications, and Performance: A Surveycited by 188
  9. 2017A Survey Of Cross-lingual Word Embedding Modelscited by 142
  10. 2016Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networkscited by 103
  11. 2017Learning Structural Node Embeddings Via Diffusion Waveletscited by 97
  12. 2015A Primer on Neural Network Models for Natural Language Processingcited by 75
14 more
  1. 2018How Complex is your classification problem? A survey on measuring classification complexitycited by 66
  2. 2020Deep Learning for Predictive Business Process Monitoring: Review and Benchmarkcited by 45
  3. 2017Outcome-Oriented Predictive Process Monitoring: Review and Benchmarkcited by 37
  4. 2015Clustering-Based Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 24
  5. 2016Time and Activity Sequence Prediction of Business Process Instancescited by 24
  6. 2017Scaling up the Automatic Statistician: Scalable Structure Discovery using Gaussian Processescited by 19
  7. 2021A Deep Adversarial Model for Suffix and Remaining Time Prediction of Event Sequencescited by 17
  8. 2020Fast Sequence-Based Embedding with Diffusion Graphscited by 14
  9. 2019BINet: Multi-perspective Business Process Anomaly Classificationcited by 13
  10. 2021A Comparison of Deep-Learning Methods for Analysing and Predicting Business Processescited by 11
  11. 2015PLG2: Multiperspective Processes Randomization and Simulation for Online and Offline Settingscited by 4
  12. 2018Multi-Level Network Embedding with Boosted Low-Rank Matrix Approximationcited by 3
  13. 2022Explainability of Predictive Process Monitoring Results: Can You See My Data Issues?cited by 3
  14. 2018Log Skeletons: A Classification Approach to Process Discoverycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

6 papers.