mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

mdok of KInIT: Robustly Fine-tuned LLM for Binary and Multiclass AI-Generated Text Detection

arXiv 2506.01702 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2025cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The large language models (LLMs) are able to generate high-quality texts in multiple languages. Such texts are often not recognizable by humans as generated, and therefore present a potential of LLMs for misuse (e.g., plagiarism, spams, disinformation spreading). An automated detection is able to assist humans to indicate the machine-generated texts; however, its robustness to out-of-distribution data is still challenging. This notebook describes our mdok approach in robust detection, based on fine-tuning smaller LLMs for text classification. It is applied to both subtasks of Voight-Kampff Generative AI Detection 2025, providing remarkable performance (1st rank) in both, the binary detection as well as the multiclass classification of various cases of human-AI collaboration.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.

Builds on

16 of 18 references.

References · 16

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023Large Language Modelscited by 780
  3. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
  4. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
  5. 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 120
  6. 2023MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 93
  7. 2022How Large Language Models are Transforming Machine-Paraphrased Plagiarismcited by 38
  8. 2023Disinformation Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 25
  9. 2024Evaluation of LLM Vulnerabilities to Being Misused for Personalized Disinformation Generationcited by 20
  10. 2024Authorship Obfuscation in Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 19
  11. 2024MultiSocial: Multilingual Benchmark of Machine-Generated Text Detection of Social-Media Textscited by 14
  12. 2023IMGTB: A Framework for Machine-Generated Text Detection Benchmarkingcited by 12
4 more
  1. 2024Is Contrasting All You Need? Contrastive Learning for the Detection and Attribution of AI-generated Textcited by 11
  2. 2025Increasing the Robustness of the Fine-tuned Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 8
  3. 2024KInIT at SemEval-2024 Task 8: Fine-tuned LLMs for Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 4
  4. 2024HU at SemEval-2024 Task 8A: Can Contrastive Learning Learn Embeddings to Detect Machine-Generated Text?cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

6 papers.