mdok of KInIT: Robustly Fine-tuned LLM for Binary and Multiclass AI-Generated Text Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The large language models (LLMs) are able to generate high-quality texts in multiple languages. Such texts are often not recognizable by humans as generated, and therefore present a potential of LLMs for misuse (e.g., plagiarism, spams, disinformation spreading). An automated detection is able to assist humans to indicate the machine-generated texts; however, its robustness to out-of-distribution data is still challenging. This notebook describes our mdok approach in robust detection, based on fine-tuning smaller LLMs for text classification. It is applied to both subtasks of Voight-Kampff Generative AI Detection 2025, providing remarkable performance (1st rank) in both, the binary detection as well as the multiclass classification of various cases of human-AI collaboration.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.
Builds on
16 of 18 references.
References · 16
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023Large Language Modelscited by 780
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
- 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
- 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 120
- 2023MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 93
- 2022How Large Language Models are Transforming Machine-Paraphrased Plagiarismcited by 38
- 2023Disinformation Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 25
- 2024Evaluation of LLM Vulnerabilities to Being Misused for Personalized Disinformation Generationcited by 20
- 2024Authorship Obfuscation in Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 19
- 2024MultiSocial: Multilingual Benchmark of Machine-Generated Text Detection of Social-Media Textscited by 14
- 2023IMGTB: A Framework for Machine-Generated Text Detection Benchmarkingcited by 12
4 more
- 2024Is Contrasting All You Need? Contrastive Learning for the Detection and Attribution of AI-generated Textcited by 11
- 2025Increasing the Robustness of the Fine-tuned Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 8
- 2024KInIT at SemEval-2024 Task 8: Fine-tuned LLMs for Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 4
- 2024HU at SemEval-2024 Task 8A: Can Contrastive Learning Learn Embeddings to Detect Machine-Generated Text?cited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
6 papers.
- 2025Authorship Attribution in Multilingual Machine-Generated Textscited by 8
- 2026Why AI-Generated Text Detection Fails: Evidence from Explainable AI Beyond Benchmark Accuracycited by 2
- 2025StylOch at PAN: Gradient-Boosted Trees with Frequency-Based Stylometric Featurescited by 0
- 2026mcdok at SemEval-2026 Task 13: Finetuning LLMs for Detection of Machine-Generated Codecited by 0
- 2026mdok-style at SemEval-2026 Task 9: Finetuning LLMs for Multilingual Polarization Detectioncited by 0
- 2026mdok-style at SemEval-2026 Task 10: Finetuning LLMs for Conspiracy Detectioncited by 0
- 2026mdok-style at SemEval-2026 Task 10: Finetuning LLMs for Conspiracy Detection4 May 2026
- 2026mdok-style at SemEval-2026 Task 9: Finetuning LLMs for Multilingual Polarization Detection4 May 2026
- 2026mcdok at SemEval-2026 Task 13: Finetuning LLMs for Detection of Machine-Generated Code23 Apr 2026
- 2026Why AI-Generated Text Detection Fails: Evidence from Explainable AI Beyond Benchmark Accuracy24 Mar 2026
- 2025Authorship Attribution in Multilingual Machine-Generated Texts3 Aug 2025
- 2025StylOch at PAN: Gradient-Boosted Trees with Frequency-Based Stylometric Features16 Jul 2025