mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Authorship Attribution in Multilingual Machine-Generated Texts

arXiv 2508.01656 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As Large Language Models (LLMs) have reached human-like fluency and coherence, distinguishing machine-generated text (MGT) from human-written content becomes increasingly difficult. While early efforts in MGT detection have focused on binary classification, the growing landscape and diversity of LLMs require a more fine-grained yet challenging authorship attribution (AA), i.e., being able to identify the precise generator (LLM or human) behind a text. However, AA remains nowadays confined to a monolingual setting, with English being the most investigated one, overlooking the multilingual nature and usage of modern LLMs. In this work, we introduce the problem of Multilingual Authorship Attribution, which involves attributing texts to human or multiple LLM generators across diverse languages. Focusing on 18 languages -- covering multiple families and writing scripts -- and 8 generators (7 LLMs and the human-authored class), we investigate the multilingual suitability of monolingual AA methods in terms of their cross-lingual transferability, and the impact of generators on attribution performance. Our results reveal that while certain monolingual AA methods can be adapted to multilingual settings, significant limitations and challenges remain, particularly in transferring across diverse language families, underscoring the complexity of multilingual AA and the need for more robust approaches to better match real-world scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2025.

Builds on

35 of 58 references.

References · 35

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  2. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  3. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  4. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  5. 2023The Falcon Series of Open Language Modelscited by 526
  6. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  7. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  8. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
  9. 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
  10. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 255
  11. 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 207
  12. 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 160
23 more
  1. 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 157
  2. 2022mGPT: Few-Shot Learners Go Multilingualcited by 141
  3. 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Textscited by 126
  4. 2023Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 111
  5. 2022Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawedcited by 104
  6. 2023Robust Multi-bit Natural Language Watermarking through Invariant Featurescited by 76
  7. 2023SeqXGPT: Sentence-Level AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 55
  8. 2024DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 52
  9. 2024Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challengescited by 46
  10. 2023Fighting Fire with Fire: Can ChatGPT Detect AI-generated Text?cited by 39
  11. 2023GPT-who: An Information Density-based Machine-Generated Text Detectorcited by 38
  12. 2023ConDA: Contrastive Domain Adaptation for AI-generated Text Detectioncited by 37
  13. 2024SHIELD: Evaluation and Defense Strategies for Copyright Compliance in LLM Text Generationcited by 33
  14. 2023HowkGPT: Investigating the Detection of ChatGPT-generated University Student Homework through Context-Aware Perplexity Analysiscited by 30
  15. 2022Findings of the The RuATD Shared Task 2022 on Artificial Text Detection in Russiancited by 29
  16. 2024Evaluation of LLM Vulnerabilities to Being Misused for Personalized Disinformation Generationcited by 20
  17. 2023Efficient Detection of LLM-generated Texts with a Bayesian Surrogate Modelcited by 18
  18. 2024Threads of Subtlety: Detecting Machine-Generated Texts Through Discourse Motifscited by 18
  19. 2024EAGLE: A Domain Generalization Framework for AI-generated Text Detectioncited by 13
  20. 2023IMGTB: A Framework for Machine-Generated Text Detection Benchmarkingcited by 12
  21. 2024Is Contrasting All You Need? Contrastive Learning for the Detection and Attribution of AI-generated Textcited by 11
  22. 2025OpenTuringBench: An Open-Model-based Benchmark and Framework for Machine-Generated Text Detection and Attributioncited by 8
  23. 2025mdok of KInIT: Robustly Fine-tuned LLM for Binary and Multiclass AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.

7 papers.