Increasing the Robustness of the Fine-tuned Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectors
On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models
Abstract (arXiv)
Since the proliferation of LLMs, there have been concerns about their misuse for harmful content creation and spreading. Recent studies justify such fears, providing evidence of LLM vulnerabilities and high potential of their misuse. Humans are no longer able to distinguish between high-quality machine-generated and authentic human-written texts. Therefore, it is crucial to develop automated means to accurately detect machine-generated content. It would enable to identify such content in online information space, thus providing an additional information about its credibility. This work addresses the problem by proposing a robust fine-tuning process of LLMs for the detection task, making the detectors more robust against obfuscation and more generalizable to out-of-distribution data.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 22 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2025.
Builds on
22 of 32 references.
References · 22
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,292
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
- 2022CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilitiescited by 249
- 2023A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failurescited by 168
- 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 132
- 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 120
- 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
- 2023MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 93
10 more
- 2023Red teaming ChatGPT via Jailbreaking: Bias, Robustness, Reliability and Toxicitycited by 89
- 2023Fighting Fire with Fire: The Dual Role of LLMs in Crafting and Detecting Elusive Disinformationcited by 51
- 2020Detecting Cross-Modal Inconsistency to Defend Against Neural Fake Newscited by 42
- 2022Deepfake Text Detection: Limitations and Opportunitiescited by 37
- 2023Overview of AuTexTification at IberLEF 2023: Detection and Attribution of Machine-Generated Text in Multiple Domainscited by 31
- 2024SemEval-2024 Task 8: Multidomain, Multimodel and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 30
- 2022Findings of the The RuATD Shared Task 2022 on Artificial Text Detection in Russiancited by 29
- 2023Towards a Robust Detection of Language Model Generated Text: Is ChatGPT that Easy to Detect?cited by 23
- 2021MTG: A Benchmark Suite for Multilingual Text Generationcited by 22
- 2022SynSciPass: detecting appropriate uses of scientific text generationcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.
8 papers.
- 2025FAID: Fine-Grained AI-Generated Text Detection Using Multi-Task Auxiliary and Multi-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 6
- 2025mdok of KInIT: Robustly Fine-tuned LLM for Binary and Multiclass AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 6
- 2025CEAID: Benchmark of Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection Methods for Central European Languagescited by 2
- 2025Beyond speculation: Measuring the growing presence of LLM-generated texts in multilingual disinformationcited by 1
- 2026Evaluation of Multilingual LLMs Personalized Text Generation Capabilities Targeting Groups and Social-Media Platformscited by 0
- 2026mcdok at SemEval-2026 Task 13: Finetuning LLMs for Detection of Machine-Generated Codecited by 0
- 2026mdok-style at SemEval-2026 Task 9: Finetuning LLMs for Multilingual Polarization Detectioncited by 0
- 2026mdok-style at SemEval-2026 Task 10: Finetuning LLMs for Conspiracy Detectioncited by 0
- 2026mdok-style at SemEval-2026 Task 10: Finetuning LLMs for Conspiracy Detection4 May 2026
- 2026mdok-style at SemEval-2026 Task 9: Finetuning LLMs for Multilingual Polarization Detection4 May 2026
- 2026mcdok at SemEval-2026 Task 13: Finetuning LLMs for Detection of Machine-Generated Code23 Apr 2026
- 2026Evaluation of Multilingual LLMs Personalized Text Generation Capabilities Targeting Groups and Social-Media Platforms7 Jan 2026
- 2025CEAID: Benchmark of Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection Methods for Central European Languages30 Sep 2025
- 2025mdok of KInIT: Robustly Fine-tuned LLM for Binary and Multiclass AI-Generated Text Detection2 Jun 2025
- 2025FAID: Fine-Grained AI-Generated Text Detection Using Multi-Task Auxiliary and Multi-Level Contrastive Learning20 May 2025
- 2025Beyond speculation: Measuring the growing presence of LLM-generated texts in multilingual disinformation29 Mar 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directions
- 2026GPTZero: Robust Detection of LLM-Generated Texts
- 2026Detecting LLM-Generated Text with Performance Guarantees
- 2023From Text to Source: Results in Detecting Large Language Model-Generated Content
- 2024Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methods
- 2024Securing Large Language Models: Addressing Bias, Misinformation, and Prompt Attacks
- 2024Understanding the Effects of Human-written Paraphrases in LLM-generated Text Detection
- 2024Evaluation of LLM Vulnerabilities to Being Misused for Personalized Disinformation Generation