mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Increasing the Robustness of the Fine-tuned Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectors

arXiv 2503.15128 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 8

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Since the proliferation of LLMs, there have been concerns about their misuse for harmful content creation and spreading. Recent studies justify such fears, providing evidence of LLM vulnerabilities and high potential of their misuse. Humans are no longer able to distinguish between high-quality machine-generated and authentic human-written texts. Therefore, it is crucial to develop automated means to accurately detect machine-generated content. It would enable to identify such content in online information space, thus providing an additional information about its credibility. This work addresses the problem by proposing a robust fine-tuning process of LLMs for the detection task, making the detectors more robust against obfuscation and more generalizable to out-of-distribution data.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 22 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2025.

Builds on

22 of 32 references.

References · 22

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  3. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  4. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,292
  5. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  6. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
  7. 2022CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilitiescited by 249
  8. 2023A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failurescited by 168
  9. 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 132
  10. 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 120
  11. 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
  12. 2023MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 93
10 more
  1. 2023Red teaming ChatGPT via Jailbreaking: Bias, Robustness, Reliability and Toxicitycited by 89
  2. 2023Fighting Fire with Fire: The Dual Role of LLMs in Crafting and Detecting Elusive Disinformationcited by 51
  3. 2020Detecting Cross-Modal Inconsistency to Defend Against Neural Fake Newscited by 42
  4. 2022Deepfake Text Detection: Limitations and Opportunitiescited by 37
  5. 2023Overview of AuTexTification at IberLEF 2023: Detection and Attribution of Machine-Generated Text in Multiple Domainscited by 31
  6. 2024SemEval-2024 Task 8: Multidomain, Multimodel and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 30
  7. 2022Findings of the The RuATD Shared Task 2022 on Artificial Text Detection in Russiancited by 29
  8. 2023Towards a Robust Detection of Language Model Generated Text: Is ChatGPT that Easy to Detect?cited by 23
  9. 2021MTG: A Benchmark Suite for Multilingual Text Generationcited by 22
  10. 2022SynSciPass: detecting appropriate uses of scientific text generationcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directions
  2. 2026GPTZero: Robust Detection of LLM-Generated Texts
  3. 2026Detecting LLM-Generated Text with Performance Guarantees
  4. 2023From Text to Source: Results in Detecting Large Language Model-Generated Content
  5. 2024Detecting AI-Generated Text: Factors Influencing Detectability with Current Methods
  6. 2024Securing Large Language Models: Addressing Bias, Misinformation, and Prompt Attacks
  7. 2024Understanding the Effects of Human-written Paraphrases in LLM-generated Text Detection
  8. 2024Evaluation of LLM Vulnerabilities to Being Misused for Personalized Disinformation Generation