HU at SemEval-2024 Task 8A: Can Contrastive Learning Learn Embeddings to Detect Machine-Generated Text?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper describes our system developed for SemEval-2024 Task 8, ``Multigenerator, Multidomain, and Multilingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detection'' Machine-generated texts have been one of the main concerns due to the use of large language models (LLM) in fake text generation, phishing, cheating in exams, or even plagiarizing copyright materials. A lot of systems have been developed to detect machine-generated text. Nonetheless, the majority of these systems rely on the text-generating model. This limitation is impractical in real-world scenarios, as it's often impossible to know which specific model the user has used for text generation. In this work, we propose a single model based on contrastive learning, which uses ≈40% of the baseline's parameters (149M vs. 355M) but shows a comparable performance on the test dataset (21st out of 137 participants). Our key finding is that even without an ensemble of multiple models, a single base model can have comparable performance with the help of data augmentation and contrastive learning. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/dipta007/SemEval24-Task8.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2024.
Builds on
26 of 38 references.
References · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,413
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
14 more
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
- 2022Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 361
- 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 261
- 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 166
- 2023MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 93
- 2023On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 88
- 2023GPT Can Solve Mathematical Problems Without a Calculatorcited by 68
- 2017Generating High-Quality and Informative Conversation Responses with Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 42
- 2022SNCSE: Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Sentence Embedding with Soft Negative Samplescited by 39
- 2022Quality Controlled Paraphrase Generationcited by 31
- 2017Trainable Greedy Decoding for Neural Machine Translationcited by 23
- 2022Improving Event Representation via Simultaneous Weakly Supervised Contrastive Learning and Clusteringcited by 11
- 2021Unsupervised Document Embedding via Contrastive Augmentationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.