mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Characterizing Data Point Vulnerability via Average-Case Robustness

arXiv 2307.13885 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2023cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Studying the robustness of machine learning models is important to ensure consistent model behaviour across real-world settings. To this end, adversarial robustness is a standard framework, which views robustness of predictions through a binary lens: either a worst-case adversarial misclassification exists in the local region around an input, or it does not. However, this binary perspective does not account for the degrees of vulnerability, as data points with a larger number of misclassified examples in their neighborhoods are more vulnerable. In this work, we consider a complementary framework for robustness, called average-case robustness, which measures the fraction of points in a local region that provides consistent predictions. However, computing this quantity is hard, as standard Monte Carlo approaches are inefficient especially for high-dimensional inputs. In this work, we propose the first analytical estimators for average-case robustness for multi-class classifiers. We show empirically that our estimators are accurate and efficient for standard deep learning models and demonstrate their usefulness for identifying vulnerable data points, as well as quantifying robustness bias of models. Overall, our tools provide a complementary view to robustness, improving our ability to characterize model behaviour.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2023.

Builds on

24 of 42 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  4. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  5. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  6. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  7. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
  8. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
  9. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  10. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 454
  11. 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 175
  12. 2022(Certified!!) Adversarial Robustness for Free!cited by 132
12 more
  1. 2022Which Explanation Should I Choose? A Function Approximation Perspective to Characterizing Post Hoc Explanationscited by 77
  2. 2018Knowledge Transfer with Jacobian Matchingcited by 76
  3. 2020Fairness Through Robustness: Investigating Robustness Disparity in Deep Learningcited by 56
  4. 2021Towards the Unification and Robustness of Perturbation and Gradient Based Explanationscited by 47
  5. 2022Probabilistically Robust Recourse: Navigating the Trade-offs between Costs and Robustness in Algorithmic Recoursecited by 40
  6. 2022Probabilistically Robust Learning: Balancing Average- and Worst-case Performancecited by 37
  7. 2020Certifying Confidence via Randomized Smoothingcited by 36
  8. 2021An Effective Baseline for Robustness to Distributional Shiftcited by 25
  9. 2022Explicit Tradeoffs between Adversarial and Natural Distributional Robustnesscited by 20
  10. 2023Which Models have Perceptually-Aligned Gradients? An Explanation via Off-Manifold Robustnesscited by 20
  11. 2022Efficiently Training Low-Curvature Neural Networkscited by 19
  12. 2019Probabilistic Verification and Reachability Analysis of Neural Networks via Semidefinite Programmingcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.