Eye of Judgement: Dissecting the Evaluation of Russian-speaking LLMs with POLLUX
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce POLLUX, a comprehensive open-source benchmark designed to evaluate the generative capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in Russian. Our main contribution is a novel evaluation methodology that enhances the interpretability of LLM assessment. For each task type, we define a set of detailed criteria and develop a scoring protocol where models evaluate responses and provide justifications for their ratings. This enables transparent, criteria-driven evaluation beyond traditional resource-consuming, side-by-side human comparisons. POLLUX includes a detailed, fine-grained taxonomy of 35 task types covering diverse generative domains such as code generation, creative writing, and practical assistant use cases, totaling 2,100 manually crafted and professionally authored prompts. Each task is categorized by difficulty (easy/medium/hard), with experts constructing the dataset entirely from scratch. We also release a family of LLM-as-a-Judge (7B and 32B) evaluators trained for nuanced assessment of generative outputs. This approach provides scalable, interpretable evaluation and annotation tools for model development, effectively replacing costly and less precise human judgments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.
Builds on
23 of 29 references.
References · 23
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,254
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
- 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 801
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 629
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 500
- 2024WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wildcited by 218
- 2023Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignmentcited by 169
11 more
- 2023Investigating Data Contamination in Modern Benchmarks for Large Language Modelscited by 138
- 2025The Leaderboard Illusioncited by 66
- 2020RussianSuperGLUE: A Russian Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 53
- 2025M-Prometheus: A Suite of Open Multilingual LLM Judgescited by 38
- 2024RuBLiMP: Russian Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairscited by 24
- 2024MERA: A Comprehensive LLM Evaluation in Russiancited by 22
- 2024Vikhr: The Family of Open-Source Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models for Russiancited by 12
- 2022TAPE: Assessing Few-shot Russian Language Understandingcited by 11
- 2024RuBia: A Russian Language Bias Detection Datasetcited by 4
- 2025REPA: Russian Error Types Annotation for Evaluating Text Generation and Judgment Capabilitiescited by 3
- 2024Long Input Benchmark for Russian Analysiscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Accelerating Unbiased LLM Evaluation via Synthetic Feedback
- 2026JudgeArena: A Unified Framework for Reproducible LLM-Judge Evaluation
- 2024CompassJudger-1: All-in-one Judge Model Helps Model Evaluation and Evolution
- 2024ConSiDERS-The-Human Evaluation Framework: Rethinking Human Evaluation for Generative Large Language Models
- 2024Sample-Efficient Human Evaluation of Large Language Models via Maximum Discrepancy Competition
- 2024Foundational Autoraters: Taming Large Language Models for Better Automatic Evaluation
- 2025Aligning Black-box Language Models with Human Judgments
- 2024Enhancing LLM Evaluations: The Garbling Trick