mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Map&Make: Schema Guided Text to Table Generation

arXiv 2505.23174 ↗First posted 29 May 2025cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transforming dense, detailed, unstructured text into an interpretable and summarised table, also colloquially known as Text-to-Table generation, is an essential task for information retrieval. Current methods, however, miss out on how and what complex information to extract; they also lack the ability to infer data from the text. In this paper, we introduce a versatile approach, Map&Make, which "dissects" text into propositional atomic statements. This facilitates granular decomposition to extract the latent schema. The schema is then used to populate the tables that capture the qualitative nuances and the quantitative facts in the original text. Our approach is tested against two challenging datasets, Rotowire, renowned for its complex and multi-table schema, and Livesum, which demands numerical aggregation. By carefully identifying and correcting hallucination errors in Rotowire, we aim to achieve a cleaner and more reliable benchmark. We evaluate our method rigorously on a comprehensive suite of comparative and referenceless metrics. Our findings demonstrate significant improvement results across both datasets with better interpretability in Text-to-Table generation. Moreover, through detailed ablation studies and analyses, we investigate the factors contributing to superior performance and validate the practicality of our framework in structured summarization tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2025.

Builds on

29 of 54 references.

References · 29

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  4. 2022Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Taskscited by 558
  5. 2016Neural Architectures for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 550
  6. 2015Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Taggingcited by 546
  7. 2021True Few-Shot Learning with Language Modelscited by 344
  8. 2016End-to-end Sequence Labeling via Bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRFcited by 341
  9. 2020HybridQA: A Dataset of Multi-Hop Question Answering over Tabular and Textual Datacited by 264
  10. 2017The E2E Dataset: New Challenges For End-to-End Generationcited by 253
  11. 2017Challenges in Data-to-Document Generationcited by 226
  12. 2021HiTab: A Hierarchical Table Dataset for Question Answering and Natural Language Generationcited by 118
17 more
  1. 2017Joint Extraction of Entities and Relations Based on a Novel Tagging Schemecited by 102
  2. 2019A General Framework for Information Extraction using Dynamic Span Graphscited by 93
  3. 2023Table-GPT: Table-tuned GPT for Diverse Table Taskscited by 69
  4. 2017Table-to-text Generation by Structure-aware Seq2seq Learningcited by 54
  5. 2020Towards Faithful Neural Table-to-Text Generation with Content-Matching Constraintscited by 48
  6. 2021Text-to-Table: A New Way of Information Extractioncited by 47
  7. 2018Table-to-Text: Describing Table Region with Natural Languagecited by 41
  8. 2024Text-Tuple-Table: Towards Information Integration in Text-to-Table Generation via Global Tuple Extractioncited by 33
  9. 2024Counting Ability of Large Language Models and Impact of Tokenizationcited by 32
  10. 2022PropSegmEnt: A Large-Scale Corpus for Proposition-Level Segmentation and Entailment Recognitioncited by 29
  11. 2023A Sequence-to-Sequence&Set Model for Text-to-Table Generationcited by 16
  12. 2022STable: Table Generation Framework for Encoder-Decoder Modelscited by 15
  13. 2024gTBLS: Generating Tables from Text by Conditional Question Answeringcited by 13
  14. 2024On the Limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs): False Attributioncited by 13
  15. 2024Can We Count on LLMs? The Fixed-Effect Fallacy and Claims of GPT-4 Capabilitiescited by 13
  16. 2024Structsum Generation for Faster Text Comprehensioncited by 9
  17. 2024Is This a Bad Table? A Closer Look at the Evaluation of Table Generation from Textcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.