Moneyball with LLMs: Analyzing Tabular Summarization in Sports Narratives
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model (LLM) approaches to tabular summarization rely on extensive prompt engineering, decomposition pipelines, or entity-level intermediate representations to achieve strong performance. While effective, these strategies are computationally expensive and offer limited insight into how well models maintain state over long, evolving narratives. We introduce SPORTABSET, a diagnostic benchmark for long-context tabular summarization across two complementary sports domains that require tracking multiple entities and aggregating statistics under domain-specific rules. Using SporTabSet, we systematically evaluate decomposition-based strategies across several long context LLMs. Results show that although decomposition substantially improves accuracy and numerical fidelity, gains stem mainly from dissecting multi-entity interference rather than improved local arithmetic. Robustness experiments further reveal high sensitivity to surface-level cues with structured failures, including hallucination, omission, and role confusion. Together, these findings identify consistent multientity memory as a key bottleneck in long context table generation, motivating diagnostic evaluation as a prerequisite for scalable, efficient and reliable tabular summarization models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2025.
Builds on
20 of 53 references.
References · 20
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 571
- 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 439
- 2022Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 314
- 2019BERT for Coreference Resolution: Baselines and Analysiscited by 125
- 2021HiTab: A Hierarchical Table Dataset for Question Answering and Natural Language Generationcited by 118
- 2023Grounded Decoding: Guiding Text Generation with Grounded Models for Embodied Agentscited by 67
- 2021Text-to-Table: A New Way of Information Extractioncited by 47
- 2024Text-Tuple-Table: Towards Information Integration in Text-to-Table Generation via Global Tuple Extractioncited by 33
8 more
- 2023A Sequence-to-Sequence&Set Model for Text-to-Table Generationcited by 16
- 2022STable: Table Generation Framework for Encoder-Decoder Modelscited by 15
- 2024gTBLS: Generating Tables from Text by Conditional Question Answeringcited by 13
- 2024Can We Count on LLMs? The Fixed-Effect Fallacy and Claims of GPT-4 Capabilitiescited by 13
- 2024Structsum Generation for Faster Text Comprehensioncited by 9
- 2024SportsMetrics: Blending Text and Numerical Data to Understand Information Fusion in LLMscited by 8
- 2025Map&Make: Schema Guided Text to Table Generationcited by 6
- 2025DICE: Structured Reasoning in LLMs through SLM-Guided Chain-of-Thought Correctioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.